Food Fraud – A Priority for EU Food Law

Abstract Adulterated wine, mislabeling of foodstuffs, dilution of olive oil – these are just a few examples of the widespread issue of food fraud. This article critically examines the EU’s legal framework for combating food fraud, revealing its shortcomings and proposing concrete solutions. The study begins by defining the concept of food fraud and analyzing key EU legal instruments, including Regulation 178/2002 and Regulation 2017/625, highlighting the lack of harmonized implementation and enforcement across Member States. Through a comparative analysis, it also emphasizes the urgent need for harmonization and stronger regulatory measures. By exposing gaps in the current framework, this research advocates for a dedicated EU legislative act to tackle food fraud effectively. It underscores the role of emerging technologies, international cooperation, and targeted reforms as essential tools for addressing this issue. Ultimately, the article seeks to advance the discourse on food fraud and provide a robust foundation for impactful legislative and policy changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10102
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Identification and Quantification in Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food Fraud – A Priority for EU Food Law

Eusebiu Crisan
1 citations
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Identification and Quantification in Food
0.81
article

Food Fraud – A Priority for EU Food Law

Eusebiu Crisan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Adulterated wine, mislabeling of foodstuffs, dilution of olive oil – these are just a few examples of the widespread issue of food fraud. This article critically examines the EU’s legal framework for combating food fraud, revealing its shortcomings and proposing concrete solutions. The study begins by defining the concept of food fraud and analyzing key EU legal instruments, including Regulation 178/2002 and Regulation 2017/625, highlighting the lack of harmonized implementation and enforcement across Member States. Through a comparative analysis, it also emphasizes the urgent need for harmonization and stronger regulatory measures. By exposing gaps in the current framework, this research advocates for a dedicated EU legislative act to tackle food fraud effectively. It underscores the role of emerging technologies, international cooperation, and targeted reforms as essential tools for addressing this issue. Ultimately, the article seeks to advance the discourse on food fraud and provide a robust foundation for impactful legislative and policy changes.

European Journal of Comparative Law and GovernanceVol. 12(3)
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Identification and Quantification in Food
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.