The Mutilated Brotherhood: Frustrating Jewish Emancipation through Post-Revolutionary Anti-Semitic Policies

Abstract Ostensibly resulting in diminishing antisemitism, French Jews’ emancipation (1790– 1791) had a price. As individuals, Jews would acquire rights while they were denied nationhood. Among Jews, the proposed status likely provoked cognitive dissonance; from the middle ages they had lived outside French society. As royal chattels, they typically were penned up in overcrowded and squalid ghettos. Now Napoleon’s lawmakers assumed control of Jewish communities, prescribed their activities, and strictly controlled erection and repair of synagogues. Organized into consistories, rabbis, as state officials, were assigned specific duties, including praying for the emperor’s welfare and collecting intelligence. To disguise his centralizing strategy, Napoleon convened a Sanhedrin to gauge Jewish preparation for assimilation. Eliding differences between Judaism and Christianity, their answers evoked a utopian brotherhood of man, perhaps unwittingly providing a roadmap for Napoleonic centralization and regulation of Jewish activities. Upon emancipation, Jews imagined social integration and liberation from ghettos, but antisemitism endured. A bargain with drawbacks, emancipation could not be equated with social equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Rabbinic Judaism
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-20250021
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mutilated Brotherhood: Frustrating Jewish Emancipation through Post-Revolutionary Anti-Semitic Policies

Shael Herman
Review of Rabbinic Judaism
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

The Mutilated Brotherhood: Frustrating Jewish Emancipation through Post-Revolutionary Anti-Semitic Policies

Shael Herman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ostensibly resulting in diminishing antisemitism, French Jews’ emancipation (1790– 1791) had a price. As individuals, Jews would acquire rights while they were denied nationhood. Among Jews, the proposed status likely provoked cognitive dissonance; from the middle ages they had lived outside French society. As royal chattels, they typically were penned up in overcrowded and squalid ghettos. Now Napoleon’s lawmakers assumed control of Jewish communities, prescribed their activities, and strictly controlled erection and repair of synagogues. Organized into consistories, rabbis, as state officials, were assigned specific duties, including praying for the emperor’s welfare and collecting intelligence. To disguise his centralizing strategy, Napoleon convened a Sanhedrin to gauge Jewish preparation for assimilation. Eliding differences between Judaism and Christianity, their answers evoked a utopian brotherhood of man, perhaps unwittingly providing a roadmap for Napoleonic centralization and regulation of Jewish activities. Upon emancipation, Jews imagined social integration and liberation from ghettos, but antisemitism endured. A bargain with drawbacks, emancipation could not be equated with social equality.

Review of Rabbinic JudaismVol. 28(2)
Tulane University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.