Rethinking Taxonomies

Abstract For centuries, philologists have employed various taxonomies to textual traditions they studied, the New Testament being no exception. In recent decades, however, serious doubts have been cast on their validity, particularly in the light of new methods such as the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method ( CBGM ). And yet, the Book of Revelation had stood on the fringe of such methodological discussions. The present article aims to remedy this. Firstly, the authors shall review the most salient previous research into the textual history of Revelation, with a particular focus on text types. After that, they shall outline their own proposal for depicting the textual tradition, informed by the application of the CBGM .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Novum Testamentum
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-bja10097
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Taxonomies

Peter Málik, Darius Müller
Novum Testamentum
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

Rethinking Taxonomies

Peter Málik, Darius Müller
article en

Abstract

Abstract For centuries, philologists have employed various taxonomies to textual traditions they studied, the New Testament being no exception. In recent decades, however, serious doubts have been cast on their validity, particularly in the light of new methods such as the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method ( CBGM ). And yet, the Book of Revelation had stood on the fringe of such methodological discussions. The present article aims to remedy this. Firstly, the authors shall review the most salient previous research into the textual history of Revelation, with a particular focus on text types. After that, they shall outline their own proposal for depicting the textual tradition, informed by the application of the CBGM .

Novum TestamentumVol. 67(4)
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Matej Bel University (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.