Chrono-Physiological Specificity: Differential Circadian Responses to Training in Runners, Jumpers, and Throwers

Abstract Introduction: While circadian variations in athletic performance are recognized, it is unclear if these rhythms are uniform across different athletic disciplines. Athletes in power (throwers), endurance (runners), and mixed-power (jumpers) events have distinct physiological profiles, which may lead to different intra-day responses to training. Objective: This study aimed to analyze and compare the circadian variations of motor and cardiac variables among three distinct groups of state-level athletes—runners, jumpers, and throwers—throughout a bimodal training day. Methods: Sixty male athletes were stratified into three groups: runners (n=20), jumpers (n=20), and throwers (n=20). Key motor (speed, agility) and cardiac (cardiorespiratory endurance, resting pulse rate) variables were measured at four time points: 06:00, 10:00, 14:00, and 18:00, corresponding to before and after morning and evening workouts. Results: Analysis of the data reveals distinct patterns of circadian response among the groups. While all groups showed performance peaks post-workout, the magnitude of change differed. Runners, for example, demonstrated the most pronounced improvement in cardiorespiratory endurance after the morning session. Throwers, whose sport is less aerobically demanding, showed a less significant change in this variable but maintained high levels of power-related metrics. Jumpers exhibited a mixed profile. Furthermore, resting pulse rate recovery patterns appeared to differ, with runners showing a more rapid return to baseline compared to the other groups, particularly after the evening session. Conclusion: Circadian responses to training are not universal but are discipline-specific. The physiological demands of an athlete's sport appear to moderate their intra-day fluctuations in motor and cardiac function. This suggests the need for chrono-physiological specificity in training design, where workout timing and intensity are tailored not just to general circadian principles, but also to the unique profile of the athlete's event.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56680
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chrono-Physiological Specificity: Differential Circadian Responses to Training in Runners, Jumpers, and Throwers

Madhavi Venkata Movva, Praveen Kumar
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
article

Chrono-Physiological Specificity: Differential Circadian Responses to Training in Runners, Jumpers, and Throwers

Madhavi Venkata Movva, Praveen Kumar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: While circadian variations in athletic performance are recognized, it is unclear if these rhythms are uniform across different athletic disciplines. Athletes in power (throwers), endurance (runners), and mixed-power (jumpers) events have distinct physiological profiles, which may lead to different intra-day responses to training. Objective: This study aimed to analyze and compare the circadian variations of motor and cardiac variables among three distinct groups of state-level athletes—runners, jumpers, and throwers—throughout a bimodal training day. Methods: Sixty male athletes were stratified into three groups: runners (n=20), jumpers (n=20), and throwers (n=20). Key motor (speed, agility) and cardiac (cardiorespiratory endurance, resting pulse rate) variables were measured at four time points: 06:00, 10:00, 14:00, and 18:00, corresponding to before and after morning and evening workouts. Results: Analysis of the data reveals distinct patterns of circadian response among the groups. While all groups showed performance peaks post-workout, the magnitude of change differed. Runners, for example, demonstrated the most pronounced improvement in cardiorespiratory endurance after the morning session. Throwers, whose sport is less aerobically demanding, showed a less significant change in this variable but maintained high levels of power-related metrics. Jumpers exhibited a mixed profile. Furthermore, resting pulse rate recovery patterns appeared to differ, with runners showing a more rapid return to baseline compared to the other groups, particularly after the evening session. Conclusion: Circadian responses to training are not universal but are discipline-specific. The physiological demands of an athlete's sport appear to moderate their intra-day fluctuations in motor and cardiac function. This suggests the need for chrono-physiological specificity in training design, where workout timing and intensity are tailored not just to general circadian principles, but also to the unique profile of the athlete's event.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chrono-Physiological Specificity: Differential Circadian Responses to Training in Runners, Jumpers, and Throwers — Madhavi Venkata Movva, Praveen Kumar · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS