Valuation of non-producing mining companies

It is not unusual for the valuations of mining companies and projects to be debated by mining investors, analysts and regulators. Difficulties understanding geological information, volatility of metals prices, high investment risks and poor historical returns on capital in the mining industry are among the reasons. An additional and important factor is the varying risk profile at different stages of a mining project. A non-zero probability of not advancing to production for a project with a positive feasibility study (FS) requires a careful analysis of its valuation methods and supportive data. Because each mining project is different, and public mining companies are a small part of the market, it's hard to compare them accurately. Once a company prepares a mineral resources report, the exploration costs cease to be a relevant value metric. We offer a practical valuation method for non-producing mining companies, accounting for development stage risks to determine market value. Recognizing the specific attributes of the mining industry, we show that the NPVs calculated using the expected cash flows and discount rates developed using the traditional CAPM framework provide realistic estimates of the project’s value, that compare well to the market indications for the peer groups. We are also investigating the large gap between the NPV values in technical reports and the actual market values of mining companies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia)
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2025-06-426
Primary Topic
Mining Techniques and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuation of non-producing mining companies

A. N. Lopatnikov, Aleksandr Yu. Rumyantsev
Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia)
Mining Techniques and Economics
article

Valuation of non-producing mining companies

A. N. Lopatnikov, Aleksandr Yu. Rumyantsev
article en

Abstract

It is not unusual for the valuations of mining companies and projects to be debated by mining investors, analysts and regulators. Difficulties understanding geological information, volatility of metals prices, high investment risks and poor historical returns on capital in the mining industry are among the reasons. An additional and important factor is the varying risk profile at different stages of a mining project. A non-zero probability of not advancing to production for a project with a positive feasibility study (FS) requires a careful analysis of its valuation methods and supportive data. Because each mining project is different, and public mining companies are a small part of the market, it's hard to compare them accurately. Once a company prepares a mineral resources report, the exploration costs cease to be a relevant value metric. We offer a practical valuation method for non-producing mining companies, accounting for development stage risks to determine market value. Recognizing the specific attributes of the mining industry, we show that the NPVs calculated using the expected cash flows and discount rates developed using the traditional CAPM framework provide realistic estimates of the project’s value, that compare well to the market indications for the peer groups. We are also investigating the large gap between the NPV values in technical reports and the actual market values of mining companies.

Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia)Vol. 10(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Mining Techniques and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Valuation of non-producing mining companies — A. N. Lopatnikov, Aleksandr Yu. Rumyantsev · Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS