The development and reality of court trial live broadcasts in China

Abstract China has aimed to develop one of the most extensive courtroom broadcasting systems in the world. Initially introduced as part of judicial reforms to enhance transparency, the system sought to normalise the live broadcasting of court trials, allowing the public to observe judicial proceedings in real time. This article evaluates how the system has operated in practice. Drawing on policy documents and empirical evidence, it argues that the broadcasting initiative became increasingly resisted by judges and courts and shaped by a court-centric logic due to administrative pressures and concerns over risks. Since around 2020, courtroom live broadcasts have gradually been suspended. Courts have scaled back their use and adopted a more managed and selective approach. This article analyses the reasons for this shift and concludes that meaningful reform is now required to ensure the system can continue to serve its stated objectives in a sustainable and principled manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Legal Discourse
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2025-2012
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development and reality of court trial live broadcasts in China

Kwan Yiu Cheng
International Journal of Legal Discourse
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

The development and reality of court trial live broadcasts in China

Kwan Yiu Cheng
article en

Abstract

Abstract China has aimed to develop one of the most extensive courtroom broadcasting systems in the world. Initially introduced as part of judicial reforms to enhance transparency, the system sought to normalise the live broadcasting of court trials, allowing the public to observe judicial proceedings in real time. This article evaluates how the system has operated in practice. Drawing on policy documents and empirical evidence, it argues that the broadcasting initiative became increasingly resisted by judges and courts and shaped by a court-centric logic due to administrative pressures and concerns over risks. Since around 2020, courtroom live broadcasts have gradually been suspended. Courts have scaled back their use and adopted a more managed and selective approach. This article analyses the reasons for this shift and concludes that meaningful reform is now required to ensure the system can continue to serve its stated objectives in a sustainable and principled manner.

International Journal of Legal DiscourseVol. 10(2)
St George's, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.