Esclavos, dependientes y alienación de la propiedad en la Iglesia visigoda

This paper will review the situation of ecclesiastical dependents (servi, mancipia, ancillae, liberti) in the Visigothic kingdom. In the main normative sources on these groups (conciliar canons, monastic rules, civil legislation), their insertion in the broader scheme of ecclesiastical property, in the moral and regulatory scheme of the Church's conduct and, above all, their regulation under the omnipresent principle of inalienability, whose objective was to avoid the subtraction of slaves or freedmen to the domestic structure of each church and especially to the patronage of the Church –the patroness that "never dies"– as an institution, becomes evident. This feature, increasingly, made it difficult for these groups of people to escape the networks of servitude and patronage of their sees. In spite of this, the sources attest that certain members of the clergy wished to grant greater freedoms to their subordinates, sometimes through actions that went beyond what was permitted by canon law, thereby realizing an illegitimate alienation of the res ecclesiae. These episodes created tensions that have already been pointed out, but, to conclude, we will outline another point of view from which we can perhaps better understand the ambiguities of the sources regarding what was an admissible alienation and the different treatment that these events and their resolutions had in the sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15581/007.35.004
Primary Topic
Classical Studies and Legal History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Esclavos, dependientes y alienación de la propiedad en la Iglesia visigoda

Juan-Alejandro González-Nestares
Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia
Classical Studies and Legal History
article

Esclavos, dependientes y alienación de la propiedad en la Iglesia visigoda

Juan-Alejandro González-Nestares
article en

Abstract

This paper will review the situation of ecclesiastical dependents (servi, mancipia, ancillae, liberti) in the Visigothic kingdom. In the main normative sources on these groups (conciliar canons, monastic rules, civil legislation), their insertion in the broader scheme of ecclesiastical property, in the moral and regulatory scheme of the Church's conduct and, above all, their regulation under the omnipresent principle of inalienability, whose objective was to avoid the subtraction of slaves or freedmen to the domestic structure of each church and especially to the patronage of the Church –the patroness that "never dies"– as an institution, becomes evident. This feature, increasingly, made it difficult for these groups of people to escape the networks of servitude and patronage of their sees. In spite of this, the sources attest that certain members of the clergy wished to grant greater freedoms to their subordinates, sometimes through actions that went beyond what was permitted by canon law, thereby realizing an illegitimate alienation of the res ecclesiae. These episodes created tensions that have already been pointed out, but, to conclude, we will outline another point of view from which we can perhaps better understand the ambiguities of the sources regarding what was an admissible alienation and the different treatment that these events and their resolutions had in the sources.

Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Classical Studies and Legal History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.