Calibration of cause-specific absolute risk for external validation using each cause-specific hazards model in the presence of competing events

If accurate predictions for both all-cause and each cause-specific absolute risks are of interest, this is best achieved by developing and validating models via the cause-specific hazards approach. For each cause-specific model, researchers should evaluate calibration plots separately using the complement of the cause-specific survival function to reveal the cause of any miscalibration. However, this also requires careful consideration of dependent censoring which must be sufficiently accounted for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00197-5
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration of cause-specific absolute risk for external validation using each cause-specific hazards model in the presence of competing events

Paul C. Lambert, Sarwar Islam Mozumder, Mark J. Rutherford, Richard D Riley et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Calibration of cause-specific absolute risk for external validation using each cause-specific hazards model in the presence of competing events

Paul C. Lambert, Sarwar Islam Mozumder, Mark J. Rutherford, Richard D Riley, Sarah Booth
article en

Abstract

If accurate predictions for both all-cause and each cause-specific absolute risks are of interest, this is best achieved by developing and validating models via the cause-specific hazards approach. For each cause-specific model, researchers should evaluate calibration plots separately using the complement of the cause-specific survival function to reveal the cause of any miscalibration. However, this also requires careful consideration of dependent censoring which must be sufficiently accounted for.

Diagnostic and Prognostic ResearchVol. 9(1)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Leicester (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), Health Data Research UK (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
AstraZeneca
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.