If you'd built a "tool" that stupid, why would you advertise the fact?

A few days ago I got a sensationally stupid email from one of those websites that most of us probably have a subscription to, but which I will not give the oxygen of publicity by linking to[1]. The subject line was: Your paper "NEURAL SPINE BIFURCATION…" is now an analogy. No; no, it's not.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Front Matter
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59350/5f44y-g3k32
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

If you'd built a "tool" that stupid, why would you advertise the fact?

Mike Taylor
Front Matter
Social Media in Health Education
article

If you'd built a "tool" that stupid, why would you advertise the fact?

Mike Taylor
article en

Abstract

A few days ago I got a sensationally stupid email from one of those websites that most of us probably have a subscription to, but which I will not give the oxygen of publicity by linking to[1]. The subject line was: Your paper "NEURAL SPINE BIFURCATION…" is now an analogy. No; no, it's not.

Front Matter
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Social Media in Health Education
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

If you'd built a "tool" that stupid, why would you advertise the fact? — Mike Taylor · Front Matter (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS