A COLONIALIDADE DO SABER

This article rescues the trajectory of paradigms and the rationality of science to understand how the coloniality of knowledge was constituted. Identifying this coloniality, in turn, gives visibility to forming a totality that results in the exclusion and silencing of peripheral knowledge in the construction of so-called scientific knowledge. Thus, it is problematized how modern scientific rationality and the relationship of coloniality of knowledge resulting from it perpetuated its marks and limited how legal knowledge was produced. In this way, the research aims to demonstrate how scientific rationality was projected as a totality and played a structuring role in the coloniality/modernity of knowledge, contributing to excluding all forms of heterogeneous knowledge on the margins of the Eurocentric reference standard. Finally, the work points to the decolonial proposal as an epistemological alternative so that legal studies can produce new legitimate theoretical options consistent with the socio-historical reality of Brazil. The present work adopts a hybrid, deductive, and decolonial method to arrive at a border epistemology or inter-epistemology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Confluências | Revista Interdisciplinar de Sociologia e Direito
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22409/conflu.v27i1.64451
Primary Topic
Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COLONIALIDADE DO SABER

Deo Campos Dutra, Fabiano Henrique De Oliveira
Confluências | Revista Interdisciplinar de Sociologia e Direito
Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
article

A COLONIALIDADE DO SABER

Deo Campos Dutra, Fabiano Henrique De Oliveira
article en

Abstract

This article rescues the trajectory of paradigms and the rationality of science to understand how the coloniality of knowledge was constituted. Identifying this coloniality, in turn, gives visibility to forming a totality that results in the exclusion and silencing of peripheral knowledge in the construction of so-called scientific knowledge. Thus, it is problematized how modern scientific rationality and the relationship of coloniality of knowledge resulting from it perpetuated its marks and limited how legal knowledge was produced. In this way, the research aims to demonstrate how scientific rationality was projected as a totality and played a structuring role in the coloniality/modernity of knowledge, contributing to excluding all forms of heterogeneous knowledge on the margins of the Eurocentric reference standard. Finally, the work points to the decolonial proposal as an epistemological alternative so that legal studies can produce new legitimate theoretical options consistent with the socio-historical reality of Brazil. The present work adopts a hybrid, deductive, and decolonial method to arrive at a border epistemology or inter-epistemology.

Confluências | Revista Interdisciplinar de Sociologia e DireitoVol. 27(1)
Universidade Católica de Brasília (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.