Protein Abundance of Clinically Relevant Drug-Metabolizing Hydrolases in Human Liver and Intestine by Targeted versus Global Proteomics Approaches: A Comparative Study

While cytochrome P450 enzymes and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases play predominant roles in drug metabolism, hydrolases are emerging as key players in the metabolism of both small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates or peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates. Despite their importance, the protein levels of hydrolases across tissues and their inter-individual variability remain poorly understood. Although targeted proteomics can provide high selectivity and precision in quantifying small numbers of proteins, total protein approach (TPA)-based proteomics is emerging as a superior approach for multiplexed quantification of proteins. We performed a head-to-head comparison of targeted proteomics and TPA-based proteomics for quantifying 12 clinically relevant hydrolases in human liver and intestinal S9 fractions (<i>N</i> = 5 each). TPA-based global proteomics offered higher precision (coefficient of variation <20%), comparable sensitivity, along with its inherent advantage of a greater protein coverage than targeted proteomics. TPA data revealed the following order of protein abundance for target proteins: CES1> EPHX1 > CES2 > BPHL > PON3 > PON1 ∼ AADAC > CTSA > DPP4 in the liver and CES2 > ADA > DPEP1 ∼ AADAC ∼ EPHX1 > ALPI > DPP4 > CTSA > BPHL ∼ CES1 in the intestine. This study highlights the utility of TPA-based global proteomics for characterizing differential tissue abundance of hydrolases and their inter-individual variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00455
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protein Abundance of Clinically Relevant Drug-Metabolizing Hydrolases in Human Liver and Intestine by Targeted versus Global Proteomics Approaches: A Comparative Study

Mitchell E. Taub, Deepak Ahire, Scott Heyward, Michael Zientek et al.
Journal of Proteome Research
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Protein Abundance of Clinically Relevant Drug-Metabolizing Hydrolases in Human Liver and Intestine by Targeted versus Global Proteomics Approaches: A Comparative Study

Mitchell E. Taub, Deepak Ahire, Scott Heyward, Michael Zientek, S. Cyrus Khojasteh, Dilip Kumar Singh, Faizan Zubair, Yu Tian, Robert S. Jones, Rie Kikuchi, Bhagwat Prasad, David M. Stresser, Bin Ma, Bill J. Smith, Ting Wang, Bernard P. Murray
article en

Abstract

While cytochrome P450 enzymes and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases play predominant roles in drug metabolism, hydrolases are emerging as key players in the metabolism of both small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates or peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates. Despite their importance, the protein levels of hydrolases across tissues and their inter-individual variability remain poorly understood. Although targeted proteomics can provide high selectivity and precision in quantifying small numbers of proteins, total protein approach (TPA)-based proteomics is emerging as a superior approach for multiplexed quantification of proteins. We performed a head-to-head comparison of targeted proteomics and TPA-based proteomics for quantifying 12 clinically relevant hydrolases in human liver and intestinal S9 fractions (<i>N</i> = 5 each). TPA-based global proteomics offered higher precision (coefficient of variation <20%), comparable sensitivity, along with its inherent advantage of a greater protein coverage than targeted proteomics. TPA data revealed the following order of protein abundance for target proteins: CES1> EPHX1 > CES2 > BPHL > PON3 > PON1 ∼ AADAC > CTSA > DPP4 in the liver and CES2 > ADA > DPEP1 ∼ AADAC ∼ EPHX1 > ALPI > DPP4 > CTSA > BPHL ∼ CES1 in the intestine. This study highlights the utility of TPA-based global proteomics for characterizing differential tissue abundance of hydrolases and their inter-individual variability.

Journal of Proteome ResearchVol. 24(11)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE), AbbVie (United States) (US), Gilead Sciences (United Kingdom) (GB), Boehringer Ingelheim (Brazil) (BR), Boehringer Ingelheim (Egypt) (EG), Takeda (United States) (US), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US), Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory (IN), University of Cincinnati (US), Sunesis (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.