Investor Valuation for Socially Responsible Assets: A Willingness to Pay Experiment

We present an experimental study of investors’ willingness to pay for socially responsible assets. In our initial public offering experiment, various assets share identical financial risk-return profiles but differ in the intensity and timing of societal benefits, represented by charitable donations. We find that subjects value societal benefits positively and prefer a positive correlation between financial returns and these societal benefits. We offer implications for the design of corporate social responsibility policies and for the pricing of responsible assets. This paper was accepted by David Sraer, finance. Funding: This work was supported by the Research Chair on Sustainable Finance at Toulouse School of Economics. S. Pouget gratefully acknowledges the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [Grant ANR-17-EURE-0010], the Research Initiative Finance Durable et Investissement Responsable, and Netspar for financial support. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01349 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01349
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investor Valuation for Socially Responsible Assets: A Willingness to Pay Experiment

Daniel Brodback, Sébastien Pouget, Nadja Guenster, Ruichen Wang
1 citations
Management Science
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Investor Valuation for Socially Responsible Assets: A Willingness to Pay Experiment

Daniel Brodback, Sébastien Pouget, Nadja Guenster, Ruichen Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present an experimental study of investors’ willingness to pay for socially responsible assets. In our initial public offering experiment, various assets share identical financial risk-return profiles but differ in the intensity and timing of societal benefits, represented by charitable donations. We find that subjects value societal benefits positively and prefer a positive correlation between financial returns and these societal benefits. We offer implications for the design of corporate social responsibility policies and for the pricing of responsible assets. This paper was accepted by David Sraer, finance. Funding: This work was supported by the Research Chair on Sustainable Finance at Toulouse School of Economics. S. Pouget gratefully acknowledges the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [Grant ANR-17-EURE-0010], the Research Initiative Finance Durable et Investissement Responsable, and Netspar for financial support. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01349 .

Management Science
University of Münster (DE), Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.