New Interfaces: How Are Interfaces and Mediums Changing

The study is devoted to the humans and artificial intelligence (AI) interaction. The authors view this interaction as mediated by interfaces that both simplify it and hide the real mechanisms of encoding and decoding messages (according to Shannon). In such a situation, the characteristics of the actor of communication are blurred, and it is not the actor himself who appears as such, but his instru­ment, and the message is not a decoded signal. However, taking a closer look at nowadays practices of interaction with AI, an invariance becomes noticeable, placing human interaction with AI in the general range of different types of pur­poseful (human) activities. The authors, having identified this invariance (gen­eral), offer their view of what is special, the specificity that is characteristic of “digital” interaction. According to the authors, modern intelligent tools make it possible to offer an “intermediate user” (a person included in the process at the stage of goal achievement). A goal formed in such a way that “on this side of the interface” it looks like it was set by AI. The authors consider the applied aspects of the situation and draw several quite interesting conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-10-67-76
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Interfaces: How Are Interfaces and Mediums Changing

Olga Maksimenkova, Alexander Segal
Voprosy filosofii
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

New Interfaces: How Are Interfaces and Mediums Changing

Olga Maksimenkova, Alexander Segal
article en

Abstract

The study is devoted to the humans and artificial intelligence (AI) interaction. The authors view this interaction as mediated by interfaces that both simplify it and hide the real mechanisms of encoding and decoding messages (according to Shannon). In such a situation, the characteristics of the actor of communication are blurred, and it is not the actor himself who appears as such, but his instru­ment, and the message is not a decoded signal. However, taking a closer look at nowadays practices of interaction with AI, an invariance becomes noticeable, placing human interaction with AI in the general range of different types of pur­poseful (human) activities. The authors, having identified this invariance (gen­eral), offer their view of what is special, the specificity that is characteristic of “digital” interaction. According to the authors, modern intelligent tools make it possible to offer an “intermediate user” (a person included in the process at the stage of goal achievement). A goal formed in such a way that “on this side of the interface” it looks like it was set by AI. The authors consider the applied aspects of the situation and draw several quite interesting conclusions.

Voprosy filosofii(10)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New Interfaces: How Are Interfaces and Mediums Changing — Olga Maksimenkova, Alexander Segal · Voprosy filosofii (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS