Industry Perspective on Nonclinical Approaches for Hepatotoxicity Risk Assessment: Insights from Two Longitudinal Surveys Conducted in 2023 and 2017

The Nonclinical Translation Working Group of the IQ Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Consortium conducted two surveys in 2023 and 2017 to canvas member companies on approaches and experiences in the preceding 5-year periods that inform how DILI risk assessment has evolved in the past decade. Surveys comprised 53 detailed questions to understand the current status, temporal changes, and future direction and to gain insights. Focusing on the 2023 survey for the most contemporary data, responses indicated that DILI still remains a problem during drug development, with 41% of companies in the 2023 survey (50% in 2017) filing at least one clinical expedited safety report in the last 5 years. Most companies have common nonclinical screening approaches, with the majority of companies incorporating target safety assessments, considering physicochemical properties and dose, and using multiple in vitro approaches including cytotoxicity, mitotoxicity, BSEP inhibition, and various reactive metabolite assays, with the utilization of many of these being increased in the 2023 survey compared to the 2017 survey. The impact of in vivo toxicology studies on clinical study design and compound progression is also reviewed in both the 2023 and 2017 surveys. A large majority of companies now report having new modality drugs in their portfolios, including antibody-based and oligonucleotide-based modalities, cell therapies, protein degraders, and peptide-based medicines; yet only 1 or 2 companies report having modality-specific approaches to assess DILI risk despite these modalities having very different mechanisms of causing DILI compared to small molecules. This is a key area for growth in the nonclinical assessment of hepatotoxicity to support these emerging modalities and the tremendous potential that they offer for unmet clinical needs. Collaborative partnerships will be key to driving new capabilities forward in this area, contributing to the development of safer novel therapeutics for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00235
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industry Perspective on Nonclinical Approaches for Hepatotoxicity Risk Assessment: Insights from Two Longitudinal Surveys Conducted in 2023 and 2017

Ravindra C. Kodihalli, Leah M. Norona, Doris Zane, Armando R. Irizarry Rovira et al.
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
article

Industry Perspective on Nonclinical Approaches for Hepatotoxicity Risk Assessment: Insights from Two Longitudinal Surveys Conducted in 2023 and 2017

Ravindra C. Kodihalli, Leah M. Norona, Doris Zane, Armando R. Irizarry Rovira, David Alpers, Jamie Karmel, Samantha C. Faber, Melanie Z. Sakatis, Jonathan P. Jackson, Jessica M. Caverly Rae, Onyi Irrechukwu, Dominic P. Williams, Debra Luffer‐Atlas, Payal Rana, Arie Regev, William R. Proctor, Fatou H. Sarr
article en

Abstract

The Nonclinical Translation Working Group of the IQ Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Consortium conducted two surveys in 2023 and 2017 to canvas member companies on approaches and experiences in the preceding 5-year periods that inform how DILI risk assessment has evolved in the past decade. Surveys comprised 53 detailed questions to understand the current status, temporal changes, and future direction and to gain insights. Focusing on the 2023 survey for the most contemporary data, responses indicated that DILI still remains a problem during drug development, with 41% of companies in the 2023 survey (50% in 2017) filing at least one clinical expedited safety report in the last 5 years. Most companies have common nonclinical screening approaches, with the majority of companies incorporating target safety assessments, considering physicochemical properties and dose, and using multiple in vitro approaches including cytotoxicity, mitotoxicity, BSEP inhibition, and various reactive metabolite assays, with the utilization of many of these being increased in the 2023 survey compared to the 2017 survey. The impact of in vivo toxicology studies on clinical study design and compound progression is also reviewed in both the 2023 and 2017 surveys. A large majority of companies now report having new modality drugs in their portfolios, including antibody-based and oligonucleotide-based modalities, cell therapies, protein degraders, and peptide-based medicines; yet only 1 or 2 companies report having modality-specific approaches to assess DILI risk despite these modalities having very different mechanisms of causing DILI compared to small molecules. This is a key area for growth in the nonclinical assessment of hepatotoxicity to support these emerging modalities and the tremendous potential that they offer for unmet clinical needs. Collaborative partnerships will be key to driving new capabilities forward in this area, contributing to the development of safer novel therapeutics for patients.

Chemical Research in ToxicologyVol. 38(11)
American Legacy Foundation (US), Amgen (United States) (US), Janssen (Belgium) (BE), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), BioClinica (United States) (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), North Hertfordshire College (GB), AstraZeneca (South Korea) (KR), Bioanalytica (Switzerland) (CH), Springhouse (US), Clinical Hospital No. 8 (RU), Takeda (United States) (US), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Drug Safety Research Unit (GB), Women's Health Initiative (US), Dermatology Specialists (US), Predictive Science (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.