Comparative Analysis of Neural Networks and Random Forests for Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA)

This paper investigates the application of deep learning techniques, Random Forest and Neural Network, for classifying transformer faults based on Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA). A real-world data set has been used, with fault labels assigned according to the IEC 61198:1993 standard, including fault classes. In order to ensure statistical reliability, each model has been evaluated over ten runs, and performance metrics have been averaged. The Random Forest model has achieved a mean accuracy of 80.87% (±9.87%), outperforming the Neural Network, which has reached a mean accuracy of 68.70% (±12.51%). Confusion matrices and class-wise metrics have showed that Random Forest has classified the majority of Normal and T3 cases correctly, while Neural Network had higher misclassification rates, especially between Normal and D1. Overall, Random Forest has exhibited greater robustness and interpretability, making it a more suitable choice for practical fault diagnostics in power transformers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v20i3.26439
Primary Topic
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Neural Networks and Random Forests for Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA)

Kjani Guri
International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE)
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
article

Comparative Analysis of Neural Networks and Random Forests for Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA)

Kjani Guri
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of deep learning techniques, Random Forest and Neural Network, for classifying transformer faults based on Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA). A real-world data set has been used, with fault labels assigned according to the IEC 61198:1993 standard, including fault classes. In order to ensure statistical reliability, each model has been evaluated over ten runs, and performance metrics have been averaged. The Random Forest model has achieved a mean accuracy of 80.87% (±9.87%), outperforming the Neural Network, which has reached a mean accuracy of 68.70% (±12.51%). Confusion matrices and class-wise metrics have showed that Random Forest has classified the majority of Normal and T3 cases correctly, while Neural Network had higher misclassification rates, especially between Normal and D1. Overall, Random Forest has exhibited greater robustness and interpretability, making it a more suitable choice for practical fault diagnostics in power transformers.

International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE)Vol. 20(3)
Technology for Energy Corporation (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.