Age discrimination against younger adults in academic and professional settings

Abstract Applying Social Identity Theory, this systematic review explores age discrimination faced by younger adults, specifically Millennials (1981–1996) and Gen Z (1997–2012), in academic and professional fields. Three significant studies demonstrating the negative impact of age discrimination on career progression were identified through a rigorous PRISMA review. The analysis demonstrates the manifestation of workplace discrimination in recruitment and compensation procedures, academic obstacles encountered in research funding, and the psychological effects on workplace performance. Systemic barriers hindering career advancement and the psychological toll of age discrimination are illuminated by these findings, which also suggest evidence-based strategies for creating more inclusive professional environments. Moreover, this review’s findings indicate three interrelated patterns: the competence-credibility paradox, retrospective bias amplification, and cumulative disadvantage, which inform policy, legislative, and early educational interventions designed to reduce age discrimination in the workplace, culminating in a call for action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Psychology
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00443-3
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age discrimination against younger adults in academic and professional settings

Asegul Hulus, Christina Michaelidou
Discover Psychology
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Age discrimination against younger adults in academic and professional settings

Asegul Hulus, Christina Michaelidou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Applying Social Identity Theory, this systematic review explores age discrimination faced by younger adults, specifically Millennials (1981–1996) and Gen Z (1997–2012), in academic and professional fields. Three significant studies demonstrating the negative impact of age discrimination on career progression were identified through a rigorous PRISMA review. The analysis demonstrates the manifestation of workplace discrimination in recruitment and compensation procedures, academic obstacles encountered in research funding, and the psychological effects on workplace performance. Systemic barriers hindering career advancement and the psychological toll of age discrimination are illuminated by these findings, which also suggest evidence-based strategies for creating more inclusive professional environments. Moreover, this review’s findings indicate three interrelated patterns: the competence-credibility paradox, retrospective bias amplification, and cumulative disadvantage, which inform policy, legislative, and early educational interventions designed to reduce age discrimination in the workplace, culminating in a call for action.

Discover PsychologyVol. 5(1)
Association for Computing Machinery (US), Cyprus College (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.