Geopolitics and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review of Firm Responses to the U.S.–China Trade War

Purpose: This study aims to systematically examine how the U.S.–China trade war has shaped firm-level innovation activities. It identifies key risk factors triggered by geopolitical tensions, analyzes firm-level responses, and evaluates long-term strategic shifts in innovation and industrial strategies. Methodology: The study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) approach following established guidelines for transparent and replicable synthesis. A structured search across ScienceDirect, JSTOR, and Emerald databases was conducted using Boolean keyword combinations related to the trade war and innovation. A total of sixteen empirical studies were identified and analyzed descriptively, focusing on theoretical mechanisms, empirical findings, and contextual variations. Findings: The review finds that the trade war introduced substantial trade policy uncertainty (TPU), producing heterogeneous impacts across firms and sectors. Financially constrained and export-dependent firms reduced R&D and experienced declines in patent quality, while larger firms and those with state support increased innovation. Common adaptive responses included geographic diversification of R&D, ESG-driven innovation, and the pursuit of indigenous technologies. TPU thus functions not only as a constraint but also as a conditional driver of “precautionary innovation” aimed at reducing foreign dependence and securing long-term competitiveness. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This study provides one of the first systematic syntheses of firm-level innovation responses to the U.S.–China trade war. It contributes to theory by framing trade policy uncertainty as both a deterrent and a stimulus to innovation. For policymakers, it highlights the importance of coordinated industrial policies that enhance resilience and technological self-reliance. For practitioners, it offers insights into how firms can transform external shocks into opportunities for long-term strategic adaptation and innovation-led competitiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Strategic Management
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.3246
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitics and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review of Firm Responses to the U.S.–China Trade War

Haram Lee
Journal of Business and Strategic Management
International Business and FDI
article

Geopolitics and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review of Firm Responses to the U.S.–China Trade War

Haram Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to systematically examine how the U.S.–China trade war has shaped firm-level innovation activities. It identifies key risk factors triggered by geopolitical tensions, analyzes firm-level responses, and evaluates long-term strategic shifts in innovation and industrial strategies. Methodology: The study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) approach following established guidelines for transparent and replicable synthesis. A structured search across ScienceDirect, JSTOR, and Emerald databases was conducted using Boolean keyword combinations related to the trade war and innovation. A total of sixteen empirical studies were identified and analyzed descriptively, focusing on theoretical mechanisms, empirical findings, and contextual variations. Findings: The review finds that the trade war introduced substantial trade policy uncertainty (TPU), producing heterogeneous impacts across firms and sectors. Financially constrained and export-dependent firms reduced R&D and experienced declines in patent quality, while larger firms and those with state support increased innovation. Common adaptive responses included geographic diversification of R&D, ESG-driven innovation, and the pursuit of indigenous technologies. TPU thus functions not only as a constraint but also as a conditional driver of “precautionary innovation” aimed at reducing foreign dependence and securing long-term competitiveness. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This study provides one of the first systematic syntheses of firm-level innovation responses to the U.S.–China trade war. It contributes to theory by framing trade policy uncertainty as both a deterrent and a stimulus to innovation. For policymakers, it highlights the importance of coordinated industrial policies that enhance resilience and technological self-reliance. For practitioners, it offers insights into how firms can transform external shocks into opportunities for long-term strategic adaptation and innovation-led competitiveness.

Journal of Business and Strategic ManagementVol. 10(14)
Hope International University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geopolitics and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review of Firm Responses to the U.S.–China Trade War — Haram Lee · Journal of Business and Strategic Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS