Contextual LCIA without the overhead: an exchange-based framework for flexible impact assessment

Abstract Purpose Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) has traditionally applied characterization factors (CFs) to elementary flows in isolation, treating impacts as fixed properties of substances, regardless of where and how they occur within the life cycle product system. While recent advances have introduced regionalized LCIA methods and GIS-based spatial modeling frameworks, these remain difficult to operationalize in routine assessments and are often limited to differentiation at the elementary flow level. This paper presents a methodological advancement in LCIA: the application of CFs at the level of exchanges—the resolved biosphere and technosphere flows between processes. Methods Shifting the CF unit from elementary flows to exchanges enables CFs to reflect the full context of each exchange, including the geographic origin and destination, the identity of the emitting process and environmental recipient, and prospective, scenario-dependent parameters. The method offers a flexible, intermediate solution between traditional elementary flow-based LCIA and full spatially explicit models, supporting national and subnational regionalization without requiring high-resolution GIS integration. Results The approach is implemented in the open-source Python library edges , which extends the Brightway LCA framework to support exchange-specific and symbolic CFs. We illustrate its capabilities through four applications: 1) Regionalized LCIA, using the AWARE water scarcity method with dynamic handling of region aggregation and disaggregation; 2) Technosphere-based LCIA, via a new implementation of the GeoPolRisk indicator, which assigns CFs based on country-to-country commodity trade relationships; and scenario-sensitive prospective LCIAs, enabling alignment with climate scenarios, where CFs are defined by symbolic expressions that depend on scenario-specific variables, with application 3) focusing on global warming potential based on atmospheric gas concentration, and application 4) addressing fossil resource scarcity through dynamic fossil fuels extraction rates. Conclusions Together, these examples demonstrate how exchange-resolved LCIA expands the methodological space of impact modeling, offering a scalable, exchange-aware framework for regional, relational, and future-oriented life cycle assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02551-7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual LCIA without the overhead: an exchange-based framework for flexible impact assessment

Jair Santillán‐Saldivar, Georg Seitfudem, Álvaro José Hahn Menacho, Christian Bauer et al.
5 citations
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
12.11
article

Contextual LCIA without the overhead: an exchange-based framework for flexible impact assessment

Jair Santillán‐Saldivar, Georg Seitfudem, Álvaro José Hahn Menacho, Christian Bauer, Maxime Agez, Romain Sacchi, Philippe Loubet, Anish Koyamparambath, Joanna Schlesinger-Martinat
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) has traditionally applied characterization factors (CFs) to elementary flows in isolation, treating impacts as fixed properties of substances, regardless of where and how they occur within the life cycle product system. While recent advances have introduced regionalized LCIA methods and GIS-based spatial modeling frameworks, these remain difficult to operationalize in routine assessments and are often limited to differentiation at the elementary flow level. This paper presents a methodological advancement in LCIA: the application of CFs at the level of exchanges—the resolved biosphere and technosphere flows between processes. Methods Shifting the CF unit from elementary flows to exchanges enables CFs to reflect the full context of each exchange, including the geographic origin and destination, the identity of the emitting process and environmental recipient, and prospective, scenario-dependent parameters. The method offers a flexible, intermediate solution between traditional elementary flow-based LCIA and full spatially explicit models, supporting national and subnational regionalization without requiring high-resolution GIS integration. Results The approach is implemented in the open-source Python library edges , which extends the Brightway LCA framework to support exchange-specific and symbolic CFs. We illustrate its capabilities through four applications: 1) Regionalized LCIA, using the AWARE water scarcity method with dynamic handling of region aggregation and disaggregation; 2) Technosphere-based LCIA, via a new implementation of the GeoPolRisk indicator, which assigns CFs based on country-to-country commodity trade relationships; and scenario-sensitive prospective LCIAs, enabling alignment with climate scenarios, where CFs are defined by symbolic expressions that depend on scenario-specific variables, with application 3) focusing on global warming potential based on atmospheric gas concentration, and application 4) addressing fossil resource scarcity through dynamic fossil fuels extraction rates. Conclusions Together, these examples demonstrate how exchange-resolved LCIA expands the methodological space of impact modeling, offering a scalable, exchange-aware framework for regional, relational, and future-oriented life cycle assessments.

The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 30(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (FR), Centre Procédés, Energies Renouvelables et Systèmes Energétiques (FR), Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.