A qualitative study of the motivations and strategies of indirect political expression among Chinese college students on digital platforms

Chinese college students navigate censorship and algorithmic constraints on digital platforms through indirect strategies such as metaphors, banter, and vague language. Based on interviews with 11 students, this study examines their motivations, cognition, and tactics. Findings show they balance risk avoidance with identity, community, and emotional needs, using pre-assessment and symbolic strategies. Overall, youth engage in playful, creative, and strategic expression, revealing new forms of political participation in Chinas digital era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Humanities Research
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/2025.27444
Primary Topic
Ideological and Political Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A qualitative study of the motivations and strategies of indirect political expression among Chinese college students on digital platforms

Wei Yifan
Advances in Humanities Research
Ideological and Political Education
article

A qualitative study of the motivations and strategies of indirect political expression among Chinese college students on digital platforms

Wei Yifan
article en

Abstract

Chinese college students navigate censorship and algorithmic constraints on digital platforms through indirect strategies such as metaphors, banter, and vague language. Based on interviews with 11 students, this study examines their motivations, cognition, and tactics. Findings show they balance risk avoidance with identity, community, and emotional needs, using pre-assessment and symbolic strategies. Overall, youth engage in playful, creative, and strategic expression, revealing new forms of political participation in Chinas digital era.

Advances in Humanities ResearchVol. 12(6)
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ideological and Political Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.