Thermally Activated Static Friction Can Explain Earthquake Interactions

Abstract Unlike meteorological hazards, tectonic earthquakes remain hardly predictable, reinforcing their deadly character. This relates to an out‐of‐equilibrium, intermittent dynamic associated with a strong time asymmetry, with few and non‐systematic foreshocks sometimes preceding large earthquakes, while aftershocks are ubiquitous and have been known for a long time. However, 130 years after Omori, the physical origin of this time asymmetry and of aftershocks remains highly debated. Here, we model earthquake interactions and natural seismicity from a spring‐slider model based on a minimal number of fundamental mechanisms, namely elastic stress transfer and reaction rate theory applied to the simplest form of static friction. This allows introducing a microscopic timescale as well as temperature in a physically meaningful way, and to strikingly reproduce many aspects of seismicity and earthquake interactions. This includes (a) a power law distribution of seismic moments, (b) an Omori's as well as productivity laws for aftershocks, (c) a clustering of aftershocks nearby the edge of the mainshock rupture zone and (d) a strong time asymmetry of the seismic cycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb032266
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermally Activated Static Friction Can Explain Earthquake Interactions

David Marsan, Jérôme Weiss, Ptashanna Thiraux
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
25.60
article

Thermally Activated Static Friction Can Explain Earthquake Interactions

David Marsan, Jérôme Weiss, Ptashanna Thiraux
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Unlike meteorological hazards, tectonic earthquakes remain hardly predictable, reinforcing their deadly character. This relates to an out‐of‐equilibrium, intermittent dynamic associated with a strong time asymmetry, with few and non‐systematic foreshocks sometimes preceding large earthquakes, while aftershocks are ubiquitous and have been known for a long time. However, 130 years after Omori, the physical origin of this time asymmetry and of aftershocks remains highly debated. Here, we model earthquake interactions and natural seismicity from a spring‐slider model based on a minimal number of fundamental mechanisms, namely elastic stress transfer and reaction rate theory applied to the simplest form of static friction. This allows introducing a microscopic timescale as well as temperature in a physically meaningful way, and to strikingly reproduce many aspects of seismicity and earthquake interactions. This includes (a) a power law distribution of seismic moments, (b) an Omori's as well as productivity laws for aftershocks, (c) a clustering of aftershocks nearby the edge of the mainshock rupture zone and (d) a strong time asymmetry of the seismic cycle.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 131(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut des Sciences de la Terre (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
25.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.