Multitask benchmarking of single-cell multimodal omics integration methods

Single-cell multimodal omics technologies have empowered the profiling of complex biological systems at a resolution and scale that were previously unattainable. These biotechnologies have propelled the fast-paced innovation and development of data integration methods, leading to a critical need for their systematic categorization, evaluation and benchmarking. Navigating and selecting the most pertinent integration approach poses a considerable challenge, contingent upon the tasks relevant to the study goals and the combination of modalities and batches present in the data at hand. Understanding how well each method performs multiple tasks, including dimension reduction, batch correction, cell type classification and clustering, imputation, feature selection and spatial registration, and at which combinations will help guide this decision. Here we develop a much-needed guideline on choosing the most appropriate method for single-cell multimodal omics data analysis through a systematic categorization and comprehensive benchmarking of current methods. The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 30 July 2024. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Multi-task_benchmarking_of_single-cell_multimodal_omics_integration_methods/26789902 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Methods
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02856-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multitask benchmarking of single-cell multimodal omics integration methods

Di Xiao, Siqu Long, Hani Jieun Kim, Shila Ghazanfar et al.
4 citations
Nature Methods
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
3.22
article

Multitask benchmarking of single-cell multimodal omics integration methods

Di Xiao, Siqu Long, Hani Jieun Kim, Shila Ghazanfar, Chunlei Liu, Sichang Ding, Pengyi Yang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Single-cell multimodal omics technologies have empowered the profiling of complex biological systems at a resolution and scale that were previously unattainable. These biotechnologies have propelled the fast-paced innovation and development of data integration methods, leading to a critical need for their systematic categorization, evaluation and benchmarking. Navigating and selecting the most pertinent integration approach poses a considerable challenge, contingent upon the tasks relevant to the study goals and the combination of modalities and batches present in the data at hand. Understanding how well each method performs multiple tasks, including dimension reduction, batch correction, cell type classification and clustering, imputation, feature selection and spatial registration, and at which combinations will help guide this decision. Here we develop a much-needed guideline on choosing the most appropriate method for single-cell multimodal omics data analysis through a systematic categorization and comprehensive benchmarking of current methods. The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 30 July 2024. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Multi-task_benchmarking_of_single-cell_multimodal_omics_integration_methods/26789902 .

Nature MethodsVol. 22(11)
The University of Sydney (AU), Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Children's Medical Research Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), The Kinghorn Cancer Centre (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.