ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: how students perceive it and how it affects their writing

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) language models, exemplified by ChatGPT, are significantly helping language learners in writing practice by providing immediate formative feedback. This study investigates whether ChatGPT’s writing feedback influences graduate students’ academic writing abilities and compares it with combined instructor and ChatGPT feedback. The students receiving only ChatGPT feedback (Group A) showed significant improvements in mechanics, tone, grammar, APA formatting, and overall writing quality, with lesser gains in organisation and no significant change in content. In contrast, the students who received combined feedback (Group B) exhibited significant enhancements in all of the parameters that were evaluated, including the areas in which Group A lagged. However, the only significant between-group difference was in grammar, although there was a marginal difference in organisation that suggested a trend towards greater improvement in Group B. The participants expressed positive attitudes about using ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool, especially for correcting grammar and enriching vocabulary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: how students perceive it and how it affects their writing

Di Zou, Lucas Kohnke, Linqian Ding
4 citations
Education and Information Technologies
Text Readability and Simplification
9.92
article

ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: how students perceive it and how it affects their writing

Di Zou, Lucas Kohnke, Linqian Ding
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) language models, exemplified by ChatGPT, are significantly helping language learners in writing practice by providing immediate formative feedback. This study investigates whether ChatGPT’s writing feedback influences graduate students’ academic writing abilities and compares it with combined instructor and ChatGPT feedback. The students receiving only ChatGPT feedback (Group A) showed significant improvements in mechanics, tone, grammar, APA formatting, and overall writing quality, with lesser gains in organisation and no significant change in content. In contrast, the students who received combined feedback (Group B) exhibited significant enhancements in all of the parameters that were evaluated, including the areas in which Group A lagged. However, the only significant between-group difference was in grammar, although there was a marginal difference in organisation that suggested a trend towards greater improvement in Group B. The participants expressed positive attitudes about using ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool, especially for correcting grammar and enriching vocabulary.

Education and Information TechnologiesVol. 30(18)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Education University of Hong Kong
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Text Readability and Simplification
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: how students perceive it and how it affects their writing — Di Zou, Lucas Kohnke, et al. · Education and Information Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS