Detectability of Crown-of-Thorns Starfish and Consequences for Culling or Removal

Population irruptions of crown-of-thorns starfish (CoTS; <i>Acanthaster</i> spp.) represent a perennial threat to Indo-Pacific coral reefs, often causing extensive coral loss and contributing to reef degradation. Therefore, extensive efforts are being made to contain population irruptions of CoTS either by culling or removing individual starfish across large reef areas. However, the efficacy and effectiveness of these management strategies are inherently constrained by limited detectability, even among adult starfish. This study adds to the limited quantitative data on the detectability of CoTS based on two independent intensive experimental studies conducted on Australia's Great Barrier Reef. During depletive sampling (where all CoTS detected were removed prior to re-surveying the same area) over 3 days at Lizard Island, a total of 96 (out of 132) CoTS were recorded during initial surveys, and the average detectability across 34 transects where CoTS were recorded was estimated to be 78.4% (±13.4 SE). Estimated detectability declined to 64.4% (±11.22 SE) on day 2, suggesting that the remaining CoTS were more cryptic. During mark-recapture studies at Rib Reef, the total sample population was estimated to comprise 411 individuals, of which 266 (64.7%) were sighted during initial (day-time) surveys, while 322 (78.3%) were sighted at night. Average detectability across all surveys was estimated to be 75.9% (±0.05 SE). Our findings reaffirm that the detectability of adult CoTS is limited, which will inherently constrain the effectiveness of culling and removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14101391
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detectability of Crown-of-Thorns Starfish and Consequences for Culling or Removal

Ciemon F. Caballes, Morgan S. Pratchett
2 citations
Biology
Marine and fisheries research
2.21
article

Detectability of Crown-of-Thorns Starfish and Consequences for Culling or Removal

Ciemon F. Caballes, Morgan S. Pratchett
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Population irruptions of crown-of-thorns starfish (CoTS; <i>Acanthaster</i> spp.) represent a perennial threat to Indo-Pacific coral reefs, often causing extensive coral loss and contributing to reef degradation. Therefore, extensive efforts are being made to contain population irruptions of CoTS either by culling or removing individual starfish across large reef areas. However, the efficacy and effectiveness of these management strategies are inherently constrained by limited detectability, even among adult starfish. This study adds to the limited quantitative data on the detectability of CoTS based on two independent intensive experimental studies conducted on Australia's Great Barrier Reef. During depletive sampling (where all CoTS detected were removed prior to re-surveying the same area) over 3 days at Lizard Island, a total of 96 (out of 132) CoTS were recorded during initial surveys, and the average detectability across 34 transects where CoTS were recorded was estimated to be 78.4% (±13.4 SE). Estimated detectability declined to 64.4% (±11.22 SE) on day 2, suggesting that the remaining CoTS were more cryptic. During mark-recapture studies at Rib Reef, the total sample population was estimated to comprise 411 individuals, of which 266 (64.7%) were sighted during initial (day-time) surveys, while 322 (78.3%) were sighted at night. Average detectability across all surveys was estimated to be 75.9% (±0.05 SE). Our findings reaffirm that the detectability of adult CoTS is limited, which will inherently constrain the effectiveness of culling and removal.

BiologyVol. 14(10)
James Cook University (AU)
James Cook University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Marine and fisheries research
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.