Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual fossil fuel projects to inform decision-making

Abstract Every additional tonne of carbon dioxide emissions adds to global warming 1 . This means that decisions to approve new fossil fuel projects represent pivotal moments in shaping Earth’s future climate trajectory. Yet, the specific additional global warming caused by project-level CO 2 emissions, and the impacts of that warming, are rarely incorporated into decision-making on the acceptability of new fossil fuel projects. Here, we show how quantifying this additional warming enables concrete, foreseeable consequences to be identified and evaluated in a formal risk assessment framework. This approach reveals that major socioeconomic and environmental consequences can be attributed to CO 2 emissions associated with individual fossil fuel projects, contrary to the pervasive unquantified claims of negligible risks by project proponents. Furthermore, as countries pursue rapid decarbonisation aligned to their Nationally Determined Contributions, the CO 2 emissions from individual fossil fuel projects can, within decades, dominate and even exceed legislated national emission limits. The practical, future-focused approaches demonstrated here offer a critical bridge between climate science and decision-making, with immediate relevance to choices that will shape Earth’s climate for decades to centuries to come.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00296-5
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual fossil fuel projects to inform decision-making

Terry P. Hughes, Katrin Juliane Meissner, A. J. Pitman, Nicola Maher et al.
7 citations
npj Climate Action
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
7.74
article

Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual fossil fuel projects to inform decision-making

Terry P. Hughes, Katrin Juliane Meissner, A. J. Pitman, Nicola Maher, Georgina Falster, Louise Slater, Nerilie J. Abram, Andrew David King, Gillian Moon, Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Wesley Morgan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Every additional tonne of carbon dioxide emissions adds to global warming 1 . This means that decisions to approve new fossil fuel projects represent pivotal moments in shaping Earth’s future climate trajectory. Yet, the specific additional global warming caused by project-level CO 2 emissions, and the impacts of that warming, are rarely incorporated into decision-making on the acceptability of new fossil fuel projects. Here, we show how quantifying this additional warming enables concrete, foreseeable consequences to be identified and evaluated in a formal risk assessment framework. This approach reveals that major socioeconomic and environmental consequences can be attributed to CO 2 emissions associated with individual fossil fuel projects, contrary to the pervasive unquantified claims of negligible risks by project proponents. Furthermore, as countries pursue rapid decarbonisation aligned to their Nationally Determined Contributions, the CO 2 emissions from individual fossil fuel projects can, within decades, dominate and even exceed legislated national emission limits. The practical, future-focused approaches demonstrated here offer a critical bridge between climate science and decision-making, with immediate relevance to choices that will shape Earth’s climate for decades to centuries to come.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Climate Extremes, Minderoo Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.