Develop an esthetic-zonal non-invasive periodontal assessment tool based on YOLOv8 and intraoral images

Objective Non-periodontal specialists ( e.g ., orthodontists and prosthodontists) often struggle to efficiently monitor periodontal health in the anterior esthetic zone. This study aimed to develop the Esthetic-zonal Non-invasive Periodontal Assessment Tool (ENPAT), a you look only once (YOLO)v8-based tool that screens oral health conditions and grades periodontal abnormalities from intraoral images. Methods From 3,608 frontal intraoral images, a lightweight YOLOv8 classification model produced unlabeled oral health grading (OHG, Fair/Acceptable/Poor) to pre-screen image labelability. For unit-level assessment, triangular gingival regions were annotated in 2,029 images for modified gingival index (MGI) and 1,847 images for papillae filling index (PFI). We trained YOLOv8s-seg and a GhostNet-modified variant (YOLOv8-Ghost) with five-fold cross-validation, using ResNet-50 as a baseline classifier. A retrospective real-world test set (MGI n = 156 and PFI n = 121) was used to assess generalization, while two junior dentists then graded the same set twice (with and without artificial intelligence (AI)) to analyze agreement (Cohen’s κ and weighted κ) with experts’ diagnosis and efficiency (ΔTime%). Results OHG achieved mean accuracy of 0.872. In cross-validation, YOLOv8 outperformed Ghost-YOLOv8 on PFI (macro-accuracy 0.927 vs . 0.920, F1-score 0.762 vs . 0.743, mAP@50 0.726 vs . 0.702; P ≤ 0.001), with smaller grade-specific gains on MGI ( e.g ., accuracy of MGI0 0.867 vs . 0.853, P = 0.017). Both YOLOv8 variants exceeded ResNet-50 on real-world set, while YOLOv8 showed the strongest overall PFI performance (accuracy 0.940, mAP@50 0.854, F1-score 0.838). YOLOv8-Ghost reduced complexity substantially (−44.2% params and −29.0% GFLOPs). With AI assistance, junior dentists’ diagnosis rose to satisfactory levels (weighted κ up to 0.799), and per-image evaluation time decreased by 18.10% for MGI and 22.79% for PFI ( P < 0.05). Conclusion ENPAT delivers real-time, multi-class grading of periodontal conditions from routine intraoral photos. The standard YOLOv8s-seg model offers the best overall accuracy and sensitivity, while YOLOv8-Ghost provides a compelling lightweight alternative. These results support ENPAT’s potential to enhance periodontal screening and education for non-periodontal practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3229
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Develop an esthetic-zonal non-invasive periodontal assessment tool based on YOLOv8 and intraoral images

Jianru Yi, Zhihe Zhao, Shoushan Hu, Heng Li et al.
PeerJ Computer Science
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Develop an esthetic-zonal non-invasive periodontal assessment tool based on YOLOv8 and intraoral images

Jianru Yi, Zhihe Zhao, Shoushan Hu, Heng Li, Jiawei Hong, Zihua Tang
article en

Abstract

Objective Non-periodontal specialists ( e.g ., orthodontists and prosthodontists) often struggle to efficiently monitor periodontal health in the anterior esthetic zone. This study aimed to develop the Esthetic-zonal Non-invasive Periodontal Assessment Tool (ENPAT), a you look only once (YOLO)v8-based tool that screens oral health conditions and grades periodontal abnormalities from intraoral images. Methods From 3,608 frontal intraoral images, a lightweight YOLOv8 classification model produced unlabeled oral health grading (OHG, Fair/Acceptable/Poor) to pre-screen image labelability. For unit-level assessment, triangular gingival regions were annotated in 2,029 images for modified gingival index (MGI) and 1,847 images for papillae filling index (PFI). We trained YOLOv8s-seg and a GhostNet-modified variant (YOLOv8-Ghost) with five-fold cross-validation, using ResNet-50 as a baseline classifier. A retrospective real-world test set (MGI n = 156 and PFI n = 121) was used to assess generalization, while two junior dentists then graded the same set twice (with and without artificial intelligence (AI)) to analyze agreement (Cohen’s κ and weighted κ) with experts’ diagnosis and efficiency (ΔTime%). Results OHG achieved mean accuracy of 0.872. In cross-validation, YOLOv8 outperformed Ghost-YOLOv8 on PFI (macro-accuracy 0.927 vs . 0.920, F1-score 0.762 vs . 0.743, mAP@50 0.726 vs . 0.702; P ≤ 0.001), with smaller grade-specific gains on MGI ( e.g ., accuracy of MGI0 0.867 vs . 0.853, P = 0.017). Both YOLOv8 variants exceeded ResNet-50 on real-world set, while YOLOv8 showed the strongest overall PFI performance (accuracy 0.940, mAP@50 0.854, F1-score 0.838). YOLOv8-Ghost reduced complexity substantially (−44.2% params and −29.0% GFLOPs). With AI assistance, junior dentists’ diagnosis rose to satisfactory levels (weighted κ up to 0.799), and per-image evaluation time decreased by 18.10% for MGI and 22.79% for PFI ( P < 0.05). Conclusion ENPAT delivers real-time, multi-class grading of periodontal conditions from routine intraoral photos. The standard YOLOv8s-seg model offers the best overall accuracy and sensitivity, while YOLOv8-Ghost provides a compelling lightweight alternative. These results support ENPAT’s potential to enhance periodontal screening and education for non-periodontal practitioners.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
Sichuan University (CN), Henan Tianguan Group (China) (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.