Ideological Dynamics of PKS and Gelora in Indonesian Democracy

This study analyzes the ideological construction of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) and the Indonesian People’s Wave Party (Gelora), focusing on differences in principles, ideological orientation, communication strategies, and socio-political base segmentation following the internal fragmentation that led to Gelora’s emergence as a splinter of PKS. The study addresses a research gap concerning how new parties build ideological legitimacy in the post-reform political era. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed through a literature study, drawing data from official party documents, scholarly articles, and online media coverage. The analysis applies Paul Lucardie’s new party theory, which categorizes parties as prophets, purifiers, or challengers. The findings reveal that PKS maintains its character as a conservative Islamic party, while Gelora emerges as an ideological challenger promoting moderate Islam, inclusive nationalism, and a geopolitical agenda. Both parties’ ideologies are shaped through official documents, public narratives, communication styles, and symbolic strategies in response to democratic and pluralistic dynamics in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrp.2025.15.1.85-104
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideological Dynamics of PKS and Gelora in Indonesian Democracy

Aris Munandar, Suwendi Suwendi
JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)
Asian Studies and History
article

Ideological Dynamics of PKS and Gelora in Indonesian Democracy

Aris Munandar, Suwendi Suwendi
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the ideological construction of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) and the Indonesian People’s Wave Party (Gelora), focusing on differences in principles, ideological orientation, communication strategies, and socio-political base segmentation following the internal fragmentation that led to Gelora’s emergence as a splinter of PKS. The study addresses a research gap concerning how new parties build ideological legitimacy in the post-reform political era. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed through a literature study, drawing data from official party documents, scholarly articles, and online media coverage. The analysis applies Paul Lucardie’s new party theory, which categorizes parties as prophets, purifiers, or challengers. The findings reveal that PKS maintains its character as a conservative Islamic party, while Gelora emerges as an ideological challenger promoting moderate Islam, inclusive nationalism, and a geopolitical agenda. Both parties’ ideologies are shaped through official documents, public narratives, communication styles, and symbolic strategies in response to democratic and pluralistic dynamics in Indonesia.

JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)Vol. 15(1)
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.