Family Ownership and the Accrual Anomaly

Synopsis The research problem We investigate whether family ownership affects the accrual anomaly, a well-documented phenomenon where accounting accruals negatively predict future earnings and stock returns. While the anomaly has been extensively studied, the role of ownership structure, particularly family ownership, remains unexplored. This research addresses whether family ownership magnifies the anomaly and through what channels. Motivation or theoretical reasoning Family firms differ in their governance, incentive alignment, and disclosure practices. These features may increase agency concerns or limit market efficiency, potentially amplifying the accrual anomaly. Understanding whether family ownership affects the anomaly contributes to the debates on ownership structure, earnings quality, and market pricing. The test hypotheses We hypothesize that (a) the accrual anomaly is stronger in family firms, (b) this effect is driven by lower persistence of discretionary accruals, and (c) mispricing is sustained due to stronger limits to arbitrage in family firms. Target population Our sample comprises 27,117 firm-year observations from 34 countries between 2007 and 2017. Adopted methodology We employ cross-sectional regressions and portfolio-based analyses to compare the accrual anomaly across family and nonfamily firms. We decompose accruals into discretionary and nondiscretionary components and use proxies such as institutional ownership, idiosyncratic volatility, illiquidity, and changes in free float to assess investor sophistication and arbitrage constraints. Analyses Accruals are less persistent and more negatively priced in family firms. Hedge portfolios earn 18.7% annually among family firms versus an insignificant 3.4% among nonfamily firms. The anomaly in family firms is primarily driven by discretionary accruals. We find no evidence that investor sophistication explains these results. However, limits to arbitrage are significantly more prevalent in family firms, constraining market correction. Findings Family ownership amplifies the accrual anomaly through lower accrual persistence and stronger arbitrage constraints. These findings are robust across multiple family firm definitions and institutional settings. The results highlight family ownership as a key factor in understanding earnings quality and market pricing, with implications for investors, regulators, and scholars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œInternational journal of accounting/International journal of accounting
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1094406025500106
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family Ownership and the Accrual Anomaly

Georgios A. Papanastasopoulos, Leonidas C. Doukakis, Adam Aoun
˜The œInternational journal of accounting/International journal of accounting
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Family Ownership and the Accrual Anomaly

Georgios A. Papanastasopoulos, Leonidas C. Doukakis, Adam Aoun
article en

Abstract

Synopsis The research problem We investigate whether family ownership affects the accrual anomaly, a well-documented phenomenon where accounting accruals negatively predict future earnings and stock returns. While the anomaly has been extensively studied, the role of ownership structure, particularly family ownership, remains unexplored. This research addresses whether family ownership magnifies the anomaly and through what channels. Motivation or theoretical reasoning Family firms differ in their governance, incentive alignment, and disclosure practices. These features may increase agency concerns or limit market efficiency, potentially amplifying the accrual anomaly. Understanding whether family ownership affects the anomaly contributes to the debates on ownership structure, earnings quality, and market pricing. The test hypotheses We hypothesize that (a) the accrual anomaly is stronger in family firms, (b) this effect is driven by lower persistence of discretionary accruals, and (c) mispricing is sustained due to stronger limits to arbitrage in family firms. Target population Our sample comprises 27,117 firm-year observations from 34 countries between 2007 and 2017. Adopted methodology We employ cross-sectional regressions and portfolio-based analyses to compare the accrual anomaly across family and nonfamily firms. We decompose accruals into discretionary and nondiscretionary components and use proxies such as institutional ownership, idiosyncratic volatility, illiquidity, and changes in free float to assess investor sophistication and arbitrage constraints. Analyses Accruals are less persistent and more negatively priced in family firms. Hedge portfolios earn 18.7% annually among family firms versus an insignificant 3.4% among nonfamily firms. The anomaly in family firms is primarily driven by discretionary accruals. We find no evidence that investor sophistication explains these results. However, limits to arbitrage are significantly more prevalent in family firms, constraining market correction. Findings Family ownership amplifies the accrual anomaly through lower accrual persistence and stronger arbitrage constraints. These findings are robust across multiple family firm definitions and institutional settings. The results highlight family ownership as a key factor in understanding earnings quality and market pricing, with implications for investors, regulators, and scholars.

˜The œInternational journal of accounting/International journal of accounting
University of Piraeus (GR), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.