Improving educational quality: the role of quality 4.0 in higher education institutions

Purpose The study aims to measure the role of Quality 4.0 in higher education institutions to improve overall educational quality. Design/methodology/approach There are 11 dimensions of Quality 4.0 (such as analytics, connectivity, collaboration, app development, scalability, management systems, compliance, quality culture, leadership, competency and data management), and their items are identified based on an experimental research approach by gathering data from 351 respondents from higher educational institutions in India. The study employed Smart-partial least square version 4.0 with structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Findings The results of this study present the dimensions of Quality 4.0, which play a significant role in explaining the positive relationship with educational performance in the research model. Of these 11 dimensions, analytics, leadership and management systems do not support this study. Research limitations/implications The findings of the study present a new lens (important parameters of the study) that can be used to analyze educational theories and adjust their applicability in the educational system. The decision-makers should also take into account the fact that the Quality4.0 characteristics are only beneficial when the outcomes are implemented in educational programs and activities. The practitioner also understands that while any criteria alone are not enough to achieve educational performance, all of them taken together are relevant to educational performance. Therefore, the organization may not always benefit from using a single parameter. Originality/value All these dimensions are vital for the education institute in increasing the performance of the student and other related elements in the system. By raising educational standards, the Quality 4.0 parameters provide promise for bringing about comprehensive progress in the field of education. The study's findings may be useful for instructors, educational institutions and educators to implement in their daily work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The TQM Journal
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-12-2024-0527
Primary Topic
E-Learning and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving educational quality: the role of quality 4.0 in higher education institutions

Arpit Singh, Nagendra Kumar Sharma, Mahender Singh Kaswan, Vimal Kumar et al.
The TQM Journal
E-Learning and Knowledge Management
article

Improving educational quality: the role of quality 4.0 in higher education institutions

Arpit Singh, Nagendra Kumar Sharma, Mahender Singh Kaswan, Vimal Kumar, Pratima Verma
article en

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to measure the role of Quality 4.0 in higher education institutions to improve overall educational quality. Design/methodology/approach There are 11 dimensions of Quality 4.0 (such as analytics, connectivity, collaboration, app development, scalability, management systems, compliance, quality culture, leadership, competency and data management), and their items are identified based on an experimental research approach by gathering data from 351 respondents from higher educational institutions in India. The study employed Smart-partial least square version 4.0 with structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Findings The results of this study present the dimensions of Quality 4.0, which play a significant role in explaining the positive relationship with educational performance in the research model. Of these 11 dimensions, analytics, leadership and management systems do not support this study. Research limitations/implications The findings of the study present a new lens (important parameters of the study) that can be used to analyze educational theories and adjust their applicability in the educational system. The decision-makers should also take into account the fact that the Quality4.0 characteristics are only beneficial when the outcomes are implemented in educational programs and activities. The practitioner also understands that while any criteria alone are not enough to achieve educational performance, all of them taken together are relevant to educational performance. Therefore, the organization may not always benefit from using a single parameter. Originality/value All these dimensions are vital for the education institute in increasing the performance of the student and other related elements in the system. By raising educational standards, the Quality 4.0 parameters provide promise for bringing about comprehensive progress in the field of education. The study's findings may be useful for instructors, educational institutions and educators to implement in their daily work.

The TQM Journal
Lovely Professional University (IN), Chaoyang University of Technology (TW), Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode (IN), Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology (IN), O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Graphic Era University (IN), Global University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
E-Learning and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.