Configuring Narrative in the Discourse of Health and Medicine

This article explores narrative as a feature of medical research writing and a means of incorporating patient-authored "perspectives" into the discourse of health and medicine. Focusing on published case reports that include a distinctive section devoted to the patient's perspective, I specifically examine how practitioner and patient narratives configure cases in different ways: the former based on conventions associated with clinical reporting; the latter based on embodied experience with illness and clinical care. My analysis shows how these perspectives can be both generative and limiting. On the one hand, they broaden the reach of patient narratives via inclusion in the research literature, and on the other hand, they have potential to conceptualize patient experience as mere perspective, supplementing the practitioner's sanctioned account rather than adding explanatory value to the case on its own terms. Acknowledging these challenges, I theorize narrative as a site of rhetorical possibility that recognizes the value of patient stories without unduly placing practitioners and patients on opposing sides of an expert/non-expert divide. The article concludes by suggesting avenues for development in areas of research, education, and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Humanities
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-025-09986-x
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Configuring Narrative in the Discourse of Health and Medicine

Chad Wickman
Journal of Medical Humanities
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Configuring Narrative in the Discourse of Health and Medicine

Chad Wickman
article en

Abstract

This article explores narrative as a feature of medical research writing and a means of incorporating patient-authored "perspectives" into the discourse of health and medicine. Focusing on published case reports that include a distinctive section devoted to the patient's perspective, I specifically examine how practitioner and patient narratives configure cases in different ways: the former based on conventions associated with clinical reporting; the latter based on embodied experience with illness and clinical care. My analysis shows how these perspectives can be both generative and limiting. On the one hand, they broaden the reach of patient narratives via inclusion in the research literature, and on the other hand, they have potential to conceptualize patient experience as mere perspective, supplementing the practitioner's sanctioned account rather than adding explanatory value to the case on its own terms. Acknowledging these challenges, I theorize narrative as a site of rhetorical possibility that recognizes the value of patient stories without unduly placing practitioners and patients on opposing sides of an expert/non-expert divide. The article concludes by suggesting avenues for development in areas of research, education, and clinical practice.

Journal of Medical Humanities
Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.