A Two-Step, Multidimensional Account of Deception in Language Models

Abstract Which AI systems are capable of deception, and how does deception differ between systems? In this paper, I develop a two-step, multi-dimensional account of LLM deception. On this account, having the capacity for deception minimally requires being able to produce false beliefs in others to achieve one’s own goals. In all systems which satisfy this minimal condition, a system’s deception profile can be characterized as a point in a multidimensional space. The five dimensions of this space are skillfulness, learning, deceptive inclination, explicitness, and situational awareness. I argue for this account in virtue of its fit with current language usage and, primarily, through its descriptive and explanatory usefulness. Specifically, the account captures the key dimensions of variation for LLM deception. The account is informative in that it allows fine-grained comparative characterizations of deception. Moreover, its dimensions are all accessible to empirical study, provide important information for assessments of the risks of LLM deception, and shed light on the cognitive processes involved in LLM deception. Finally, this account paves the way for a future extension which delivers a unified account of deception in biological and non-biological systems. Thus, the multidimensional account promises to significantly advance both the scientific study as well as the ethical assessment of LLM deception, and deception generally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erkenntnis
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-01017-4
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Two-Step, Multidimensional Account of Deception in Language Models

Leonard Dung
Erkenntnis
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

A Two-Step, Multidimensional Account of Deception in Language Models

Leonard Dung
article en

Abstract

Abstract Which AI systems are capable of deception, and how does deception differ between systems? In this paper, I develop a two-step, multi-dimensional account of LLM deception. On this account, having the capacity for deception minimally requires being able to produce false beliefs in others to achieve one’s own goals. In all systems which satisfy this minimal condition, a system’s deception profile can be characterized as a point in a multidimensional space. The five dimensions of this space are skillfulness, learning, deceptive inclination, explicitness, and situational awareness. I argue for this account in virtue of its fit with current language usage and, primarily, through its descriptive and explanatory usefulness. Specifically, the account captures the key dimensions of variation for LLM deception. The account is informative in that it allows fine-grained comparative characterizations of deception. Moreover, its dimensions are all accessible to empirical study, provide important information for assessments of the risks of LLM deception, and shed light on the cognitive processes involved in LLM deception. Finally, this account paves the way for a future extension which delivers a unified account of deception in biological and non-biological systems. Thus, the multidimensional account promises to significantly advance both the scientific study as well as the ethical assessment of LLM deception, and deception generally.

Erkenntnis
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.