Contemporary Trends in Lithium‐Sulfur Battery Design: A Comparative Review of Liquid, Quasi‐Solid, and All‐Solid‐State Architectures and Mechanisms

Abstract The lithium sulfur battery offers disruptive potential for applications that demand high energy density, and sustainable materials supply chains. Whilst the liquid‐based Li‐S technology has studied for decades, it is only comparatively recently that the chemistry has gained significant commercial traction. Historically significant and persistent challenges have hampered the technology, most pressingly, poor cyclability; however, recent efforts have demonstrated viable routes to overcome these impediments, with commercial traction increasing across the globe. These developments have addressed commercialization barriers, including the use of LiNO 3 as an electrolyte additive. For example, recent activity has shown progress toward more ‘solid‐state’ conversion mechanisms, including the so‐called ‘quasi‐solid state’ system. The contemporary research landscape across liquid, quasi‐ and all‐solid‐state Li‐S chemistries is reviewed. For each, a didactic overview of the underpinning operation is provided, and the literature on new mechanistic understanding, state‐of‐the‐art characterization and materials solutions is comprehensively examined. The Li‐S battery is at an inflection point in commercial deployment; this review aims to highlight the need to increase the focus of academic research on overcoming the remaining barriers to commercialization whilst continuing to identify fundamental operating mechanisms and material developments to accelerate the realization of the potential of this chemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202503239
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary Trends in Lithium‐Sulfur Battery Design: A Comparative Review of Liquid, Quasi‐Solid, and All‐Solid‐State Architectures and Mechanisms

Boyi Pang, James B. Robinson, Paul Robert Shearing, Liam Bird et al.
5 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
3.65
article

Contemporary Trends in Lithium‐Sulfur Battery Design: A Comparative Review of Liquid, Quasi‐Solid, and All‐Solid‐State Architectures and Mechanisms

Boyi Pang, James B. Robinson, Paul Robert Shearing, Liam Bird, Yanming Shao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The lithium sulfur battery offers disruptive potential for applications that demand high energy density, and sustainable materials supply chains. Whilst the liquid‐based Li‐S technology has studied for decades, it is only comparatively recently that the chemistry has gained significant commercial traction. Historically significant and persistent challenges have hampered the technology, most pressingly, poor cyclability; however, recent efforts have demonstrated viable routes to overcome these impediments, with commercial traction increasing across the globe. These developments have addressed commercialization barriers, including the use of LiNO 3 as an electrolyte additive. For example, recent activity has shown progress toward more ‘solid‐state’ conversion mechanisms, including the so‐called ‘quasi‐solid state’ system. The contemporary research landscape across liquid, quasi‐ and all‐solid‐state Li‐S chemistries is reviewed. For each, a didactic overview of the underpinning operation is provided, and the literature on new mechanistic understanding, state‐of‐the‐art characterization and materials solutions is comprehensively examined. The Li‐S battery is at an inflection point in commercial deployment; this review aims to highlight the need to increase the focus of academic research on overcoming the remaining barriers to commercialization whilst continuing to identify fundamental operating mechanisms and material developments to accelerate the realization of the potential of this chemistry.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 16(2)
Oxford Brookes University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Advanced Propulsion Centre (GB), The Faraday Institution (GB), University College London (GB)
Royal Academy of Engineering, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.