Impact of air quality policy scenarios on pollution inequalities in a UK metropolitan area

Fine particles (particulate matter (PM)<sub>2.5</sub>) affect health, with no observable thresholds below which exposure can be considered safe. The World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines (AQGs, 2021) reflect this evidence base, providing ambitious, health-based guidelines and interim targets for the protection of human health worldwide. In England, the Environment Act 2021 established new, legally binding environmental targets for long-term PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, comprising both an annual mean concentration target and a population exposure reduction target (PERT), to be achieved by 31 December 2040. However, the benefits of these targets in reducing air pollution inequalities among different sociodemographic groups remain undefined. Using the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA, population ~2.9 million) as a reference, we assessed the health impacts of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in the year 2019 and evaluated the extent to which existing UK targets and the WHO guidelines address air quality inequalities in this diverse, metropolitan region. We found that ~41% of the WMCA population lived in areas where annual mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations exceeded the long-term annual mean concentration target of 10 μg m<sup>-3</sup>. In addition, PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels across the region exceeded the WHO AQGs. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were significantly higher for those living in areas with greater socioeconomic deprivation. The WMCA has a younger-than-average population, which further increases health risks for residents. The most significant health benefits are experienced in the most deprived and densely populated areas. The PERT approach offers the broadest population-level benefits across the region; however, it may still leave some of the most deprived locations failing to meet the AQG targets. Our findings suggest that coordinated regional actions to improve air quality, in line with PERT approaches and pathways towards achieving the WHO guidelines, will deliver the greatest impact on reducing health inequities in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1690825
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of air quality policy scenarios on pollution inequalities in a UK metropolitan area

Suzanne Bartington, Zongbo Shi, James Robert Hodgson, William J. Bloss
Frontiers in Public Health
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Impact of air quality policy scenarios on pollution inequalities in a UK metropolitan area

Suzanne Bartington, Zongbo Shi, James Robert Hodgson, William J. Bloss
article en

Abstract

Fine particles (particulate matter (PM)<sub>2.5</sub>) affect health, with no observable thresholds below which exposure can be considered safe. The World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines (AQGs, 2021) reflect this evidence base, providing ambitious, health-based guidelines and interim targets for the protection of human health worldwide. In England, the Environment Act 2021 established new, legally binding environmental targets for long-term PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, comprising both an annual mean concentration target and a population exposure reduction target (PERT), to be achieved by 31 December 2040. However, the benefits of these targets in reducing air pollution inequalities among different sociodemographic groups remain undefined. Using the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA, population ~2.9 million) as a reference, we assessed the health impacts of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in the year 2019 and evaluated the extent to which existing UK targets and the WHO guidelines address air quality inequalities in this diverse, metropolitan region. We found that ~41% of the WMCA population lived in areas where annual mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations exceeded the long-term annual mean concentration target of 10 μg m<sup>-3</sup>. In addition, PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels across the region exceeded the WHO AQGs. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were significantly higher for those living in areas with greater socioeconomic deprivation. The WMCA has a younger-than-average population, which further increases health risks for residents. The most significant health benefits are experienced in the most deprived and densely populated areas. The PERT approach offers the broadest population-level benefits across the region; however, it may still leave some of the most deprived locations failing to meet the AQG targets. Our findings suggest that coordinated regional actions to improve air quality, in line with PERT approaches and pathways towards achieving the WHO guidelines, will deliver the greatest impact on reducing health inequities in the region.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
University of Birmingham (GB)
Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.