GraphFlow v1.0: approximating groundwater contaminant transport with graph-based methods – an application to fault scenario selection

Abstract. Groundwater contaminant transport problems remain challenging with respect to their computing requirements. This often limits the exploration of the conceptual uncertainty that is mainly related to large-scale geological features – such as faults, fractures, and stratigraphic variations – and limited characterization. Here, to facilitate geological conceptual uncertainty exploration, we develop further the use of graph representation for geological models to approximate groundwater flow and transport. We consider a faulted multi-heterogeneous-layer medium to test our approach. The existing rank correlation between the shortest path distribution from a contaminant source to the model domain outlet and the cumulative mass distribution at the outlet enables us to perform scenario selection. The scenario selection approach relies on a metric combining the Jaccard dissimilarity and the Wasserstein distance to compare binary images. Among a set combining eight alternative scenarios, where three faults can act as either a flow barrier or a preferential path, we show that the use of graph approximations allows us to retain or reject scenarios with confidence, as well as to estimate the individual probability of a fault to act as a barrier or a path. This methodology framework opens up possibilities to explore more thoroughly conceptual geological uncertainty for processes affected by flow and transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7147-2025
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GraphFlow v1.0: approximating groundwater contaminant transport with graph-based methods – an application to fault scenario selection

Kerry Bardot, James L. McCallum, Mark Jessell, Guillaume Pirot et al.
Geoscientific model development
Geological Modeling and Analysis
article

GraphFlow v1.0: approximating groundwater contaminant transport with graph-based methods – an application to fault scenario selection

Kerry Bardot, James L. McCallum, Mark Jessell, Guillaume Pirot, Léonard Moracchini
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Groundwater contaminant transport problems remain challenging with respect to their computing requirements. This often limits the exploration of the conceptual uncertainty that is mainly related to large-scale geological features – such as faults, fractures, and stratigraphic variations – and limited characterization. Here, to facilitate geological conceptual uncertainty exploration, we develop further the use of graph representation for geological models to approximate groundwater flow and transport. We consider a faulted multi-heterogeneous-layer medium to test our approach. The existing rank correlation between the shortest path distribution from a contaminant source to the model domain outlet and the cumulative mass distribution at the outlet enables us to perform scenario selection. The scenario selection approach relies on a metric combining the Jaccard dissimilarity and the Wasserstein distance to compare binary images. Among a set combining eight alternative scenarios, where three faults can act as either a flow barrier or a preferential path, we show that the use of graph approximations allows us to retain or reject scenarios with confidence, as well as to estimate the individual probability of a fault to act as a barrier or a path. This methodology framework opens up possibilities to explore more thoroughly conceptual geological uncertainty for processes affected by flow and transport.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(19)
The University of Western Australia (AU), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.