Refining the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in GMOs

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carries out safety assessments of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Here, toxicity and allergenicity assessments are the cornerstone of NEP evaluation, ensuring that any potential health hazards are rigorously identified and characterised. Recent examples of EFSA's NEP safety assessments illustrate how novel methodologies, alongside established ones reconsidered from new perspectives, guide case-by-case decisions. These advances provide an opportunity to improve the robustness, proportionality, and scientific credibility of risk assessments. Moreover, it may alleviate the need for <i>in vivo</i> animal testing. Building on this development, EFSA aims to integrate new approach methodologies (NAMs) into risk assessment to provide a scientific basis for waiving <i>in vivo</i> testing, aligning its approach with the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) and the European Commission's roadmap for phasing out animal testing. Overall, this shift reflects a broader transformation in EFSA's safety assessment of NEPs, characterised by openness to innovation, optimisation of existing methods, and ensuring preparedness for future risk assessment needs. The ultimate goal is to ensure the highest level of protection for human and animal health, while embracing scientific progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Toxicology
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1679506
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in GMOs

Arianna Ferrari, Kevin Hogeveen, Antonio Fernández‐Dumont, Reinhilde Schoonjans et al.
Frontiers in Toxicology
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Refining the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in GMOs

Arianna Ferrari, Kevin Hogeveen, Antonio Fernández‐Dumont, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Ivan Dimitrov, Tilemachos Goumperis, Frits Koning, F. Javier Moreno, M. Epstein, Ian Crawford Dewhurst, Michele Ardizzone, Elena Sánchez‐Brunete
article en

Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carries out safety assessments of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Here, toxicity and allergenicity assessments are the cornerstone of NEP evaluation, ensuring that any potential health hazards are rigorously identified and characterised. Recent examples of EFSA's NEP safety assessments illustrate how novel methodologies, alongside established ones reconsidered from new perspectives, guide case-by-case decisions. These advances provide an opportunity to improve the robustness, proportionality, and scientific credibility of risk assessments. Moreover, it may alleviate the need for <i>in vivo</i> animal testing. Building on this development, EFSA aims to integrate new approach methodologies (NAMs) into risk assessment to provide a scientific basis for waiving <i>in vivo</i> testing, aligning its approach with the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) and the European Commission's roadmap for phasing out animal testing. Overall, this shift reflects a broader transformation in EFSA's safety assessment of NEPs, characterised by openness to innovation, optimisation of existing methods, and ensuring preparedness for future risk assessment needs. The ultimate goal is to ensure the highest level of protection for human and animal health, while embracing scientific progress.

Frontiers in ToxicologyVol. 7
European Food Safety Authority (IT), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Medical University of Sofia (BG), Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR), Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (ES), University of York (GB), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.