Using posterior probability informed thresholds to develop best practice recommendations for MorphoPASSE using the innominate, cranial, and combined traits

MorphoPASSE is a free program that estimates sex based on morphological traits of the innominate, cranium, or a combined set of traits; however, MorphoPASSE does not provide recommendations on which set of traits performs best or recommend a posterior probability (PP) threshold for sex classification in modern forensic casework. The goals of this study were to compare accuracy rates when using different sets of traits and when imposing posterior probability informed thresholds (PPITs). Innominate and cranial trait score data were collected from four modern US documented skeletal collections (n = 285). Accuracy rates for five mutually exclusive PP intervals were calculated, and PP intervals that were significantly different from chance were condensed into PPITs. Using a PPIT of 0.85-1.00 produced high accuracy rates of 97.3% for the innominate traits and 90.2% for the cranial traits. Using the combined set of innominate and cranial traits resulted in significantly higher accuracy (99.6%) with a lower PPIT of 0.75-1.00. Additionally, the combined trait model corrected all previous misclassifications by either producing a correct sex classification or leaving the individual unclassified for failing to reach the required PPIT. Therefore, when both elements are available, the combined set of traits is recommended with a 0.75-1.00 PPIT. Individuals with a PP falling between 0.75 and 1.00 should be reported as consistent with the male or female reference samples, while those falling below should be reported as "could not be estimated." Use of these recommendations will help standardize the use of MorphoPASSE and reporting sex estimation results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70192
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using posterior probability informed thresholds to develop best practice recommendations for MorphoPASSE using the innominate, cranial, and combined traits

Kate M. Lesciotto, Alexandra R. Klales
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Using posterior probability informed thresholds to develop best practice recommendations for MorphoPASSE using the innominate, cranial, and combined traits

Kate M. Lesciotto, Alexandra R. Klales
article en

Abstract

MorphoPASSE is a free program that estimates sex based on morphological traits of the innominate, cranium, or a combined set of traits; however, MorphoPASSE does not provide recommendations on which set of traits performs best or recommend a posterior probability (PP) threshold for sex classification in modern forensic casework. The goals of this study were to compare accuracy rates when using different sets of traits and when imposing posterior probability informed thresholds (PPITs). Innominate and cranial trait score data were collected from four modern US documented skeletal collections (n = 285). Accuracy rates for five mutually exclusive PP intervals were calculated, and PP intervals that were significantly different from chance were condensed into PPITs. Using a PPIT of 0.85-1.00 produced high accuracy rates of 97.3% for the innominate traits and 90.2% for the cranial traits. Using the combined set of innominate and cranial traits resulted in significantly higher accuracy (99.6%) with a lower PPIT of 0.75-1.00. Additionally, the combined trait model corrected all previous misclassifications by either producing a correct sex classification or leaving the individual unclassified for failing to reach the required PPIT. Therefore, when both elements are available, the combined set of traits is recommended with a 0.75-1.00 PPIT. Individuals with a PP falling between 0.75 and 1.00 should be reported as consistent with the male or female reference samples, while those falling below should be reported as "could not be estimated." Use of these recommendations will help standardize the use of MorphoPASSE and reporting sex estimation results.

Journal of Forensic SciencesVol. 71(1)
University of North Texas (US), Washburn University (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.