Use Case Point Activity-Based Costing and Adjusted Function Point for Software Cost Estimation

Effective software development planning is vital across various industries, and inadequate planning can lead to project failures. A key part of this planning is accurately estimating effort and costs, which is crucial for staying within budget and meeting deadlines. This research compares two methods – Use Case Point Activity Based Costing (with 21 complexity factors) and Adjusted Function Point (with 16 complexity factors) – for estimating costs versus actual values. The analysis reveals that the Use Case Point method had a 23.52% deviation from actual costs, while the Adjusted Function Point method had a 33.35% deviation. These findings provide essential reference points during software project planning, ensuring estimates closely align with actual values based on project-specific attributes. This deviation underscores the importance of precision and selecting appropriate methodologies tailored to each project’s unique characteristics. Ultimately, this research equips businesses and project managers with a robust financial prudence framework and enhances the likelihood of project success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v18i2.46669
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use Case Point Activity-Based Costing and Adjusted Function Point for Software Cost Estimation

Dewi Khairani, Suraya Abdul-Razak, Fitri Mintarsih, Andria Farhan et al.
JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA
Software Engineering Research
article

Use Case Point Activity-Based Costing and Adjusted Function Point for Software Cost Estimation

Dewi Khairani, Suraya Abdul-Razak, Fitri Mintarsih, Andria Farhan, Ahmad Fauzan Haryono
article en

Abstract

Effective software development planning is vital across various industries, and inadequate planning can lead to project failures. A key part of this planning is accurately estimating effort and costs, which is crucial for staying within budget and meeting deadlines. This research compares two methods – Use Case Point Activity Based Costing (with 21 complexity factors) and Adjusted Function Point (with 16 complexity factors) – for estimating costs versus actual values. The analysis reveals that the Use Case Point method had a 23.52% deviation from actual costs, while the Adjusted Function Point method had a 33.35% deviation. These findings provide essential reference points during software project planning, ensuring estimates closely align with actual values based on project-specific attributes. This deviation underscores the importance of precision and selecting appropriate methodologies tailored to each project’s unique characteristics. Ultimately, this research equips businesses and project managers with a robust financial prudence framework and enhances the likelihood of project success.

JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKAVol. 18(2)
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Use Case Point Activity-Based Costing and Adjusted Function Point for Software Cost Estimation — Dewi Khairani, Suraya Abdul-Razak, et al. · JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS