A Strategic Approach for Accelerated Development and Economic Assessment of a Greenfield in the Sarawak Basin

Abstract Recently discovered Field A, situated among mature brownfields within the Sarawak Basin, represents a significant greenfield development opportunity for early monetization. The development team leveraged on extensive real-world data from analogous fields, resulting in fast-tracking the transition from exploration to development phase for this Field A. This paper presents the case study to deliver this plan, aiming to establish the field production profile and phased development concept. Given the stretched timeline of less than a year, the team began forecasting using a Material Balance or tank model approach targeting the main reservoirs. In the absence of well testing during the exploration phase, the team relied on benchmarking analyses using regional and brownfield data. Key parameters such as initial oil rate per string, permeability-thickness versus highest tested rate, recovery factor for the main reservoirs, productivity index, and drainage radius were derived from nearby fields. This benchmark analysis was included in the tank model predictions and the resulting production profiles for the base case scenario, which focuses on the major reservoirs with depletion recovery strategy. The overall greenfield development strategy integrates static and dynamic modelling to assess various development scenarios for primary and secondary recovery. The tank model approach facilitated the field recovery benchmarking and well count optimization. Further, with the static model delivery, a full field dynamic model is planned to comprehensively evaluate minor reservoirs and secondary recovery strategies. Due to the undeveloped nature of the field, reservoir engineering (RE) uncertainty analysis was conducted. The forecast range was designed to encompass risks and uncertainties, including contacts and structural uncertainties affecting connected and recoverable volumes, given the unknown strength of the aquifer and gas cap support. The current analysis, utilizing the tank model, incorporates sensitivity analysis to identify which parameters most significantly impact the forecasting results, particularly the recoverable volume. The full-field model will further evaluate uncertainty management strategies. Besides that, the team is also evaluating appraisal well requirements to gather more information and mitigate uncertainties, optimizing well location and completion strategy prior to execution. This approach expedited reservoir engineering work despite inherent uncertainties in greenfield projects. The comprehensive use of analog field data and benchmarking, combined with sensitivity analysis and uncertainty management, facilitated a robust and expedited development plan, ensuring a viable economic assessment for this greenfield. This fit-for-purpose methodology for resource evaluation followed by an appropriate development concept and economic assessment is quite generic and can be effectively applied to greenfield projects targeting early monetization across the oil and gas industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/226395-ms
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Strategic Approach for Accelerated Development and Economic Assessment of a Greenfield in the Sarawak Basin

Mark Anthony Hughes, Nur Hazwani Izyan Hashim, Nicolas Grippo, Ankaj Kumar Sinha
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

A Strategic Approach for Accelerated Development and Economic Assessment of a Greenfield in the Sarawak Basin

Mark Anthony Hughes, Nur Hazwani Izyan Hashim, Nicolas Grippo, Ankaj Kumar Sinha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recently discovered Field A, situated among mature brownfields within the Sarawak Basin, represents a significant greenfield development opportunity for early monetization. The development team leveraged on extensive real-world data from analogous fields, resulting in fast-tracking the transition from exploration to development phase for this Field A. This paper presents the case study to deliver this plan, aiming to establish the field production profile and phased development concept. Given the stretched timeline of less than a year, the team began forecasting using a Material Balance or tank model approach targeting the main reservoirs. In the absence of well testing during the exploration phase, the team relied on benchmarking analyses using regional and brownfield data. Key parameters such as initial oil rate per string, permeability-thickness versus highest tested rate, recovery factor for the main reservoirs, productivity index, and drainage radius were derived from nearby fields. This benchmark analysis was included in the tank model predictions and the resulting production profiles for the base case scenario, which focuses on the major reservoirs with depletion recovery strategy. The overall greenfield development strategy integrates static and dynamic modelling to assess various development scenarios for primary and secondary recovery. The tank model approach facilitated the field recovery benchmarking and well count optimization. Further, with the static model delivery, a full field dynamic model is planned to comprehensively evaluate minor reservoirs and secondary recovery strategies. Due to the undeveloped nature of the field, reservoir engineering (RE) uncertainty analysis was conducted. The forecast range was designed to encompass risks and uncertainties, including contacts and structural uncertainties affecting connected and recoverable volumes, given the unknown strength of the aquifer and gas cap support. The current analysis, utilizing the tank model, incorporates sensitivity analysis to identify which parameters most significantly impact the forecasting results, particularly the recoverable volume. The full-field model will further evaluate uncertainty management strategies. Besides that, the team is also evaluating appraisal well requirements to gather more information and mitigate uncertainties, optimizing well location and completion strategy prior to execution. This approach expedited reservoir engineering work despite inherent uncertainties in greenfield projects. The comprehensive use of analog field data and benchmarking, combined with sensitivity analysis and uncertainty management, facilitated a robust and expedited development plan, ensuring a viable economic assessment for this greenfield. This fit-for-purpose methodology for resource evaluation followed by an appropriate development concept and economic assessment is quite generic and can be effectively applied to greenfield projects targeting early monetization across the oil and gas industry.

Petronas (Malaysia) (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.