The Path Forward for Vaccine Policy in the United States

For over 60 years, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which comprised a diverse group of nonpartisan specialists, has advised the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccine recommendations based on science and intensive review of evidence. The abrupt dismantling of the rigorously vetted process and the replacement of the Committee with an inexperienced and biased panel has engendered fundamental distrust in the Committee’s vital work. The process of recommending vaccines in the United States has undergone a seismic disruption. The government has abruptly changed vaccine policy through social media postings and publications in news media. These actions circumvented the standard methodology, whereby committees of scientists and clinicians conduct rigorous scientific review and open deliberation to make vaccine recommendations, which are published with clear justification of the decision-making process. As the 17 voting members of the ACIP dismissed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in June 2025, we consider paths forward for U.S. vaccine policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/ssd1-cv75
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Path Forward for Vaccine Policy in the United States

Yvonne Maldonado, Helen Y. Chu, Oliver Brooks, Albert C. Shaw et al.
UNC Libraries
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

The Path Forward for Vaccine Policy in the United States

Yvonne Maldonado, Helen Y. Chu, Oliver Brooks, Albert C. Shaw, Denise J. Jamieson, Sybil Cineas, Jane R. Zucker, Edwin J. Asturias, Charlotte A. Moser, George A. Kuchel, H. Keipp Talbot, Lin H. Chen, Noel T. Brewer, Jamie Loehr, Robert Schechter, Mini Kamboj, K. Lyons
article en

Abstract

For over 60 years, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which comprised a diverse group of nonpartisan specialists, has advised the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccine recommendations based on science and intensive review of evidence. The abrupt dismantling of the rigorously vetted process and the replacement of the Committee with an inexperienced and biased panel has engendered fundamental distrust in the Committee’s vital work. The process of recommending vaccines in the United States has undergone a seismic disruption. The government has abruptly changed vaccine policy through social media postings and publications in news media. These actions circumvented the standard methodology, whereby committees of scientists and clinicians conduct rigorous scientific review and open deliberation to make vaccine recommendations, which are published with clear justification of the decision-making process. As the 17 voting members of the ACIP dismissed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in June 2025, we consider paths forward for U.S. vaccine policy.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.