Collective action governance of the offshore wind farms: An empirical Dutch perspective on the North Sea

The North Sea has a significant potential for offshore wind energy, making it important in the European energy transition. However, it presents challenges, particularly regarding required changes to marine spatial planning (MSP), impacting the ecological and social systems. This study explores the potential of collective action as an alternative governance approach to managing the North Sea and its offshore wind farms as a common-pool resource. Following the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework, a semi-structured interview was developed and conducted with 14 Dutch experts. The results demonstrated different levels of governance and the settings influencing these levels. The research identified the following conditions that impact the opportunities for collective action on the North Sea energy resources: complex cost-benefit allocation, monitoring of resources, and a positive attitude towards collaboration. The results also indicated that the actors are willing to collaborate, and collective action could be a potential alternative governance approach for such a complex, large (energy) system. Future research avenues and recommendations are also presented. • The IAD framework is used to study the offshore wind farms in the North Sea. • The study collects empirical data by conducting interviews with 14 Dutch experts. • Collective action is suitable for managing large, complex (energy) systems. • roboStandard evaluation criteria for offshore wind farm developments are missing. • Certain actors and interactions are missing in the related decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100664
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective action governance of the offshore wind farms: An empirical Dutch perspective on the North Sea

Javanshir Fouladvand, Emma Baan
1 citations
Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.11
article

Collective action governance of the offshore wind farms: An empirical Dutch perspective on the North Sea

Javanshir Fouladvand, Emma Baan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The North Sea has a significant potential for offshore wind energy, making it important in the European energy transition. However, it presents challenges, particularly regarding required changes to marine spatial planning (MSP), impacting the ecological and social systems. This study explores the potential of collective action as an alternative governance approach to managing the North Sea and its offshore wind farms as a common-pool resource. Following the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework, a semi-structured interview was developed and conducted with 14 Dutch experts. The results demonstrated different levels of governance and the settings influencing these levels. The research identified the following conditions that impact the opportunities for collective action on the North Sea energy resources: complex cost-benefit allocation, monitoring of resources, and a positive attitude towards collaboration. The results also indicated that the actors are willing to collaborate, and collective action could be a potential alternative governance approach for such a complex, large (energy) system. Future research avenues and recommendations are also presented. • The IAD framework is used to study the offshore wind farms in the North Sea. • The study collects empirical data by conducting interviews with 14 Dutch experts. • Collective action is suitable for managing large, complex (energy) systems. • roboStandard evaluation criteria for offshore wind farm developments are missing. • Certain actors and interactions are missing in the related decision-making processes.

Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and ComplexityVol. 11(4)
Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.