Post-Stratified Inference for Pairwise Treatment Comparisons in Randomized Block Designs

Abstract In this study, we introduce a novel approach to statistical inference for multiple comparison procedures in a generalized randomized complete block design (RCBD) by employing post-stratification of experimental units. After completing the experiment, our method involves randomly pairing within-block experimental units (EUs) subjected to two different treatments, t and $$t'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> . Each pair of experimental units is then ranked based on pre-treatment auxiliary (covariate) information, assuming no treatment effects. These ranked sets are subsequently divided into two distinct categories, which serve as an additional blocking factor based on the ranking of within-set experimental units. The first ranking block contains the sets where the lower rank corresponds to treatment t and the higher rank to treatment $$t'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , while the second ranking block contains the reverse treatment allocation. This post-stratification is performed for all possible pairs of treatments with $$t&lt;t'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Based on this post-stratified data, we develop a multiple comparison procedure for all pairwise contrast parameters. The proposed procedure demonstrates superior statistical power and yields narrower confidence intervals for multiple pairwise contrast inferences when the assumptions of the analysis of covariance model are not satisfied. The application of the proposed procedure is illustrated using experimental data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-025-00714-5
Primary Topic
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Stratified Inference for Pairwise Treatment Comparisons in Randomized Block Designs

Ömer Öztürk, Olena Kravchuk
Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
article

Post-Stratified Inference for Pairwise Treatment Comparisons in Randomized Block Designs

Ömer Öztürk, Olena Kravchuk
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we introduce a novel approach to statistical inference for multiple comparison procedures in a generalized randomized complete block design (RCBD) by employing post-stratification of experimental units. After completing the experiment, our method involves randomly pairing within-block experimental units (EUs) subjected to two different treatments, t and $$t'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> . Each pair of experimental units is then ranked based on pre-treatment auxiliary (covariate) information, assuming no treatment effects. These ranked sets are subsequently divided into two distinct categories, which serve as an additional blocking factor based on the ranking of within-set experimental units. The first ranking block contains the sets where the lower rank corresponds to treatment t and the higher rank to treatment $$t'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , while the second ranking block contains the reverse treatment allocation. This post-stratification is performed for all possible pairs of treatments with $$t&lt;t'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Based on this post-stratified data, we develop a multiple comparison procedure for all pairwise contrast parameters. The proposed procedure demonstrates superior statistical power and yields narrower confidence intervals for multiple pairwise contrast inferences when the assumptions of the analysis of covariance model are not satisfied. The application of the proposed procedure is illustrated using experimental data.

Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics
Wine Australia (AU), The Ohio State University (US), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Australian Government, Grains Research and Development Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.