Re-Examining Energy-Growth Nexus in 27 Selected South Countries: Heterogeneous Panel Model

This paper examines the link between energy consumption and economic growth using a panel data sample of 27 Southern countries observed over the period 2002-2020. To capture long-run effects, we used appropriate panel data econometric techniques in the presence of cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, while Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) causality tests examined short-run causal effects. Our results show that (i) in the long run, energy consumption has a negative and significant effect on economic growth in all countries, while other variables have a positive and significant effect, except institutional quality form, which is not significant both in short and long run on economic growth. (ii) in the short run, all variables have a positive and significant effect on economic and, (iii) causality tests confirm the feedback hypothesis between energy consumption and growth. The study concludes by calling on policymakers to strengthen institutional qualities and adopt financial and energy efficiency policies that could sustain economic development in the long run.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.20474
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-Examining Energy-Growth Nexus in 27 Selected South Countries: Heterogeneous Panel Model

Bédi Guy Hervé Drama
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Re-Examining Energy-Growth Nexus in 27 Selected South Countries: Heterogeneous Panel Model

Bédi Guy Hervé Drama
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the link between energy consumption and economic growth using a panel data sample of 27 Southern countries observed over the period 2002-2020. To capture long-run effects, we used appropriate panel data econometric techniques in the presence of cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, while Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) causality tests examined short-run causal effects. Our results show that (i) in the long run, energy consumption has a negative and significant effect on economic growth in all countries, while other variables have a positive and significant effect, except institutional quality form, which is not significant both in short and long run on economic growth. (ii) in the short run, all variables have a positive and significant effect on economic and, (iii) causality tests confirm the feedback hypothesis between energy consumption and growth. The study concludes by calling on policymakers to strengthen institutional qualities and adopt financial and energy efficiency policies that could sustain economic development in the long run.

International Journal of Energy Economics and PolicyVol. 15(6)
Université Pelefero Gon Coulibaly (CI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Re-Examining Energy-Growth Nexus in 27 Selected South Countries: Heterogeneous Panel Model — Bédi Guy Hervé Drama · International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS