Impact of breed on growth performance and sensory meat attributes in Goliath and Sasso chickens

Poultry farming plays a crucial role in meeting global protein demand. The aim of this study was to assess the bioeconomic performance, carcass yields, and meat quality of Goliath chickens (GC), naked neck Sasso (NS), and feathered neck Sasso (FS). The experiment involved 300 chickens, divided into three groups of 100 chickens each, with four replicates of 25 chickens each. The experiment lasted sixteen weeks, during which all groups received ad-libitum feeding with starter, grower, and finisher diets. Results showed that NS (42.03 g/chicken) exhibited higher feed intake compared to GC (38.44 g/chicken). GC displayed greater weight growth (1.68 kg) compared to NS (1.59 kg) and FS (1.49 kg) (p < 0.05). The feed conversion ratio was statistically similar among GC (2.63 g feed/g weight), NS (2.67 g feed/g weight), and FS (2.74 g feed/g weight) (p > 0.05). Carcass yield and breast percentage were greater in Sasso than in Goliath chickens. The meat from the breast (6.06) and thigh (6.11) of GC exhibited higher acidity compared to NS (6.43 - 6.69) and FS (6.33 - 6.64). Sensory evaluation revealed superior overall quality of GC meat compared to NS and FS. Sasso and Goliath chickens raised under identical conditions demonstrated relatively similar growth performance. However, GC produced meat with enhanced sensory quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2571438
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of breed on growth performance and sensory meat attributes in Goliath and Sasso chickens

Coovi Guénolé Akouedegni, Milognon Boris Behingan, Boko Michel Orounladji, C. A. A. M. Chrysostome et al.
1 citations
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
article

Impact of breed on growth performance and sensory meat attributes in Goliath and Sasso chickens

Coovi Guénolé Akouedegni, Milognon Boris Behingan, Boko Michel Orounladji, C. A. A. M. Chrysostome, Vivianne Agbanrin, Ulrich Spéro Edikou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Poultry farming plays a crucial role in meeting global protein demand. The aim of this study was to assess the bioeconomic performance, carcass yields, and meat quality of Goliath chickens (GC), naked neck Sasso (NS), and feathered neck Sasso (FS). The experiment involved 300 chickens, divided into three groups of 100 chickens each, with four replicates of 25 chickens each. The experiment lasted sixteen weeks, during which all groups received ad-libitum feeding with starter, grower, and finisher diets. Results showed that NS (42.03 g/chicken) exhibited higher feed intake compared to GC (38.44 g/chicken). GC displayed greater weight growth (1.68 kg) compared to NS (1.59 kg) and FS (1.49 kg) (p < 0.05). The feed conversion ratio was statistically similar among GC (2.63 g feed/g weight), NS (2.67 g feed/g weight), and FS (2.74 g feed/g weight) (p > 0.05). Carcass yield and breast percentage were greater in Sasso than in Goliath chickens. The meat from the breast (6.06) and thigh (6.11) of GC exhibited higher acidity compared to NS (6.43 - 6.69) and FS (6.33 - 6.64). Sensory evaluation revealed superior overall quality of GC meat compared to NS and FS. Sasso and Goliath chickens raised under identical conditions demonstrated relatively similar growth performance. However, GC produced meat with enhanced sensory quality.

Cogent Food & AgricultureVol. 11(1)
Poultry Research Institute (CN), Université d'Abomey-Calavi (BJ), Institut Supérieur Agronomique et Vétérinaire Valéry Giscard d'Estaing (GN), Poultry CRC (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.