Comparing Surface and Deep Learning Strategies and Their Relationship to High School Students' Academic Performance in Science

The strategies students use in their learning processes are crucial to their academic success, particularly in complex subjects like science. Students' preferred learning strategies can significantly influence their academic performance as they navigate scientific concepts. This study examined the relationship between academic achievement and the utilization of deep and surface learning strategies among high school students at a private institution in Carmen, Cebu, Philippines. It seeks to understand how these strategies influence science learning and suggests teaching practices to promote a practical learning experience. A mixed-method approach was employed, integrating quantitative data from a standardized questionnaire with qualitative insights from student interviews. A sample of 101 students was selected from 136 participants, determined using RAOSOFT, ensuring a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. The study utilized the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) to assess learning strategies. Findings showed that high-performing students preferred deep learning strategies, though the correlation with performance was weak. Moderate academic performers used both strategies, while low performers relied on surface learning, which was linked to lower achievement. Promoting deep learning strategies alongside surface learning, especially for lower-performing students, is recommended to foster curiosity and motivation to improve academic performance and achieve long-term success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.15.1.199
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Surface and Deep Learning Strategies and Their Relationship to High School Students' Academic Performance in Science

Romel C. Mutya, Desiree Mae P. Gabut, Mary Erian M. Rojo, Wendy C. Casas et al.
European Journal of Educational Research
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Comparing Surface and Deep Learning Strategies and Their Relationship to High School Students' Academic Performance in Science

Romel C. Mutya, Desiree Mae P. Gabut, Mary Erian M. Rojo, Wendy C. Casas, Reynaldo C. Jr. Tondo, Ryan M. Mahilum
article en

Abstract

The strategies students use in their learning processes are crucial to their academic success, particularly in complex subjects like science. Students' preferred learning strategies can significantly influence their academic performance as they navigate scientific concepts. This study examined the relationship between academic achievement and the utilization of deep and surface learning strategies among high school students at a private institution in Carmen, Cebu, Philippines. It seeks to understand how these strategies influence science learning and suggests teaching practices to promote a practical learning experience. A mixed-method approach was employed, integrating quantitative data from a standardized questionnaire with qualitative insights from student interviews. A sample of 101 students was selected from 136 participants, determined using RAOSOFT, ensuring a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. The study utilized the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) to assess learning strategies. Findings showed that high-performing students preferred deep learning strategies, though the correlation with performance was weak. Moderate academic performers used both strategies, while low performers relied on surface learning, which was linked to lower achievement. Promoting deep learning strategies alongside surface learning, especially for lower-performing students, is recommended to foster curiosity and motivation to improve academic performance and achieve long-term success.

European Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 15(1)
Cebu Technological University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.