Comparing Thinking Frameworks: Positioning Design Thinking among Thinking Models in Science Education

The present study investigates the distinctive contribution of design thinking towards the development of science education for 21st century. Conceptual Analysis method was adopted for this study. The findings of the analysis showed that design thinking provides a human- centered, iterative approach that incorporates empathy ideation and prototyping in contrast to other thinking models like critical thinking, analytical thinking, systems thinking, logical thinking and creative thinking. This study supports inquiry- based learning, highlighting the potential of design thinking as a transformative pedagogical approach that promotes both cognitive and socio- emotional development. Using a comparative framework, the study illustrates the unique way in which design thinking solves difficult, ill- defined problems in science classrooms. While acknowledging implementation and assessment issues, this study shows pathways for incorporating design thinking in science education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i102538
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Thinking Frameworks: Positioning Design Thinking among Thinking Models in Science Education

V.K. Subashini, Satchi Venkataraman
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Comparing Thinking Frameworks: Positioning Design Thinking among Thinking Models in Science Education

V.K. Subashini, Satchi Venkataraman
article en

Abstract

The present study investigates the distinctive contribution of design thinking towards the development of science education for 21st century. Conceptual Analysis method was adopted for this study. The findings of the analysis showed that design thinking provides a human- centered, iterative approach that incorporates empathy ideation and prototyping in contrast to other thinking models like critical thinking, analytical thinking, systems thinking, logical thinking and creative thinking. This study supports inquiry- based learning, highlighting the potential of design thinking as a transformative pedagogical approach that promotes both cognitive and socio- emotional development. Using a comparative framework, the study illustrates the unique way in which design thinking solves difficult, ill- defined problems in science classrooms. While acknowledging implementation and assessment issues, this study shows pathways for incorporating design thinking in science education.

Asian Journal of Education and Social StudiesVol. 51(10)
Central University of Tamil Nadu (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.