The Principle of Justice In The Revocation of Child Adoption Determination By Adoptive Parents (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 31/Pdt.G/2022/PN Njk)

This research examines the revocation of a child's adoption order by highlighting aspects of justice, both for the child and the adoptive parents. The focus of the discussion is directed at the Nganjuk State Court Decision No. 31/Pdt.G/2022/PN.NJK, in which the judge granted the revocation of adoption on the basis of the best interests of the child. However, the decision raises issues because it does not pay attention to the rights and contributions of adoptive parents who have provided care for many years. The type of research used is Normative Juridical with a case approach, legislation, and comparison. Data sources come from primary legal materials in the form of laws and decisions, and are strengthened by literature as secondary legal materials. Analysis is carried out qualitatively through the study of doctrine and legal norms. The results of this study indicate that the judge's consideration is more in favor of child protection, but creates an imbalance for adoptive parents. Therefore, clearer legal arrangements are needed regarding the mechanism for revocation of adoption, so as to provide legal certainty as well as a sense of justice for all parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2430
Primary Topic
Marriage and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Principle of Justice In The Revocation of Child Adoption Determination By Adoptive Parents (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 31/Pdt.G/2022/PN Njk)

Atik Winanti, Anugrah Fitria
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Marriage and Family Dynamics
article

The Principle of Justice In The Revocation of Child Adoption Determination By Adoptive Parents (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 31/Pdt.G/2022/PN Njk)

Atik Winanti, Anugrah Fitria
article en

Abstract

This research examines the revocation of a child's adoption order by highlighting aspects of justice, both for the child and the adoptive parents. The focus of the discussion is directed at the Nganjuk State Court Decision No. 31/Pdt.G/2022/PN.NJK, in which the judge granted the revocation of adoption on the basis of the best interests of the child. However, the decision raises issues because it does not pay attention to the rights and contributions of adoptive parents who have provided care for many years. The type of research used is Normative Juridical with a case approach, legislation, and comparison. Data sources come from primary legal materials in the form of laws and decisions, and are strengthened by literature as secondary legal materials. Analysis is carried out qualitatively through the study of doctrine and legal norms. The results of this study indicate that the judge's consideration is more in favor of child protection, but creates an imbalance for adoptive parents. Therefore, clearer legal arrangements are needed regarding the mechanism for revocation of adoption, so as to provide legal certainty as well as a sense of justice for all parties.

Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesVol. 6(1)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Marriage and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.