Triggering motivations for change: exploring engagement in adult police-led drug diversion programs

Background The harm reduction effects of police drug diversion (PDD) are influenced by how people engage with diversion, which is moderated by their motivation to change. Underlying influences can be revealed by examining the contexts and mechanisms which trigger and support participants’ motivation for engagement and change. Methods The qualitative phase of a realist evaluation of three PDD programs in England used semi-structured interviews with police officers, diversion practitioners, and divertees. Collaborative, abductive analysis focused on contexts and mechanisms of motivation and the nature of engagement. Results Contexts featuring positive interactions were moderated by negative perceptions of intervention environments, course content and delivery, and feelings of dissatisfaction with drug policy and legislation. Short PDD programs without individually tailored support worked well in triggering consequential thinking to motivate some people involved in experimental and/or occasional drug use. More intensive, longer and individualized forms seemed to be more effective in supporting and building motivation among people with more complex needs. Neither form of PDD succeeded in motivating people who believed their substance use was beneficial, unproblematic, or who disagreed with current drug laws. Conclusion Findings suggest that PDD programs require careful tailoring to the diverse needs of people who are diverted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2025.2566921
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triggering motivations for change: exploring engagement in adult police-led drug diversion programs

Charlie E. Sutton, Alex Stevens, Rivka Smith, Helen Glasspoole-Bird et al.
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Triggering motivations for change: exploring engagement in adult police-led drug diversion programs

Charlie E. Sutton, Alex Stevens, Rivka Smith, Helen Glasspoole-Bird, Matthew Bacon, Nadine Hendrie, Mark Monaghan
article en

Abstract

Background The harm reduction effects of police drug diversion (PDD) are influenced by how people engage with diversion, which is moderated by their motivation to change. Underlying influences can be revealed by examining the contexts and mechanisms which trigger and support participants’ motivation for engagement and change. Methods The qualitative phase of a realist evaluation of three PDD programs in England used semi-structured interviews with police officers, diversion practitioners, and divertees. Collaborative, abductive analysis focused on contexts and mechanisms of motivation and the nature of engagement. Results Contexts featuring positive interactions were moderated by negative perceptions of intervention environments, course content and delivery, and feelings of dissatisfaction with drug policy and legislation. Short PDD programs without individually tailored support worked well in triggering consequential thinking to motivate some people involved in experimental and/or occasional drug use. More intensive, longer and individualized forms seemed to be more effective in supporting and building motivation among people with more complex needs. Neither form of PDD succeeded in motivating people who believed their substance use was beneficial, unproblematic, or who disagreed with current drug laws. Conclusion Findings suggest that PDD programs require careful tailoring to the diverse needs of people who are diverted.

Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Loughborough University (GB), University of Kent (GB), Indonesia Open University (ID), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.