Interdisciplinary Scientific Schools As a Factor in the Development of Higher Education: Value Guidelines and Institutional Transformation

The article examines the problems of identification and effective functioning of scientific schools in the modern system of higher education and science. Based on the analysis of the data of the questionnaires of the scientific staff of the SPB of the FOC RAN, the key institutional and methodological difficulties related to verification of scientific schools and allocation of resources were identified. It was found that the lack of strict evaluation criteria leads to the financing of formal, rather than productive scientific teams, reducing the effectiveness of public science policy. Special attention is paid to the value aspect of research activities, which affect the professional development of students and young scientists within the framework of the work of scientific schools. Empirical data confirm the importance of the axiological approach in forming a stable scientific environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Standards and Monitoring in Education
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/1998-1740-2025-13-4-55-65
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdisciplinary Scientific Schools As a Factor in the Development of Higher Education: Value Guidelines and Institutional Transformation

Stolina Kul'tenko
Standards and Monitoring in Education
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Interdisciplinary Scientific Schools As a Factor in the Development of Higher Education: Value Guidelines and Institutional Transformation

Stolina Kul'tenko
article en

Abstract

The article examines the problems of identification and effective functioning of scientific schools in the modern system of higher education and science. Based on the analysis of the data of the questionnaires of the scientific staff of the SPB of the FOC RAN, the key institutional and methodological difficulties related to verification of scientific schools and allocation of resources were identified. It was found that the lack of strict evaluation criteria leads to the financing of formal, rather than productive scientific teams, reducing the effectiveness of public science policy. Special attention is paid to the value aspect of research activities, which affect the professional development of students and young scientists within the framework of the work of scientific schools. Empirical data confirm the importance of the axiological approach in forming a stable scientific environment.

Standards and Monitoring in EducationVol. 13(4)
Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interdisciplinary Scientific Schools As a Factor in the Development of Higher Education: Value Guidelines and Institutional Transformation — Stolina Kul'tenko · Standards and Monitoring in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS