Evaluation of a De‐Escalated Post‐Operative Cochlear Implant Programming Protocol

ABSTRACT Objective Cochlear implantation often requires frequent post‐operative programming visits which can disrupt daily life, impose financial burdens, and delay access for new cochlear implant (CI) candidates. This study evaluated the feasibility of a de‐escalated schedule of four programming appointments within the first year after surgery. Methods A retrospective review was completed for 236 patients aged 0–100 years who received CI from July 2022 to December 2023. Explants, reimplants and second CI within the study window were excluded. Collected data included demographics, schedule adherence, additional visit reason, and Consonant‐Nucleus‐Consonant (CNC) word scores for adults. Results A total of 201 CI recipients (mean age 46.9 years; 72.6% adults) met inclusion criteria. Most were male (53%), White (88%), Non‐Hispanic (54.7%), and privately insured (56.2%). Overall, 53% adhered to the 4‐visit protocol, 35% required 1–2 additional visits, and 12% required 3–6. Among those requiring additional appointments ( n = 95), 28.4% followed the prior protocol of up to 10+ visits. Adherence to the new streamlined protocol improved by 43% over the study period. On multivariate analysis, each additional year of age at surgery reduced the odds of adherence by 3.4% ( p < 0.05). No statistical or clinical differences were observed in 12‐month CNC scores between patients with ≤ 4 versus > 4 visits. Conclusions A de‐escalated post‐CI programming schedule of four visits in the first year is feasible and does not compromise adult speech perception outcomes. Older patients may require closer follow‐up. Successful implementation may require time for workflows and provider adoption. Level of Evidence 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70172
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a De‐Escalated Post‐Operative Cochlear Implant Programming Protocol

Samantha Espinal, Meredith A. Holcomb, Leena Asfour, Michelle Coppola
The Laryngoscope
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Evaluation of a De‐Escalated Post‐Operative Cochlear Implant Programming Protocol

Samantha Espinal, Meredith A. Holcomb, Leena Asfour, Michelle Coppola
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Cochlear implantation often requires frequent post‐operative programming visits which can disrupt daily life, impose financial burdens, and delay access for new cochlear implant (CI) candidates. This study evaluated the feasibility of a de‐escalated schedule of four programming appointments within the first year after surgery. Methods A retrospective review was completed for 236 patients aged 0–100 years who received CI from July 2022 to December 2023. Explants, reimplants and second CI within the study window were excluded. Collected data included demographics, schedule adherence, additional visit reason, and Consonant‐Nucleus‐Consonant (CNC) word scores for adults. Results A total of 201 CI recipients (mean age 46.9 years; 72.6% adults) met inclusion criteria. Most were male (53%), White (88%), Non‐Hispanic (54.7%), and privately insured (56.2%). Overall, 53% adhered to the 4‐visit protocol, 35% required 1–2 additional visits, and 12% required 3–6. Among those requiring additional appointments ( n = 95), 28.4% followed the prior protocol of up to 10+ visits. Adherence to the new streamlined protocol improved by 43% over the study period. On multivariate analysis, each additional year of age at surgery reduced the odds of adherence by 3.4% ( p < 0.05). No statistical or clinical differences were observed in 12‐month CNC scores between patients with ≤ 4 versus > 4 visits. Conclusions A de‐escalated post‐CI programming schedule of four visits in the first year is feasible and does not compromise adult speech perception outcomes. Older patients may require closer follow‐up. Successful implementation may require time for workflows and provider adoption. Level of Evidence 3.

The LaryngoscopeVol. 136(3)
University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.