THE NDVI VALUES DIFFERENCES IN RELATION TO CANOPY DENSITY USING SENTINEL-2 LEVEL-2A REMOTE SENSING DATA

This paper presents the results of a research on the relationship between the NDVI and stand canopy density.The study was conducted within the Forest Management Unit ''Bruske ume'', located in Central Serbia.The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a significant difference between the NDVI values depending on stand canopy density in high forests, coppice forests and artificially established stands.The stand canopy density data were collected from the Forest Management Plan and validated in the field, while the NDVI data were obtained using the Google Earth Engine platform based on Sentinel-2 Level 2A imagery.A one-way ANOVA was performed to assess the statistical significance of differences in the NDVI values between stand canopy density classes, followed by an LSD test for post-hoc group comparisons.The results of the research indicate that the arithmetic means of the NDVI values by stand canopy density across the three forest origin categories reveal a clear and consistent trend of decrease of the NDVI values with decreasing stand canopy density.The ANOVA revealed that the NDVI values differed significantly between stands with different levels of canopy density within each of the three forest origin groups.In all analyzed categories, stands with a dense canopy had the highest NDVI values.The highest NDVI values were recorded in high forest stands, while the lowest values were observed in artificially established stands.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal Agriculture and Forestry
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17707/agricultforest.71.3.11
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE NDVI VALUES DIFFERENCES IN RELATION TO CANOPY DENSITY USING SENTINEL-2 LEVEL-2A REMOTE SENSING DATA

Nenad Petrović, Miloš Račić, Nikola Martać, Dragan Borota et al.
The Journal Agriculture and Forestry
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

THE NDVI VALUES DIFFERENCES IN RELATION TO CANOPY DENSITY USING SENTINEL-2 LEVEL-2A REMOTE SENSING DATA

Nenad Petrović, Miloš Račić, Nikola Martać, Dragan Borota, Aleksandar GOLUBOVIC, Nemanja LAZAREVIC, Ivana RACIC
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a research on the relationship between the NDVI and stand canopy density.The study was conducted within the Forest Management Unit ''Bruske ume'', located in Central Serbia.The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a significant difference between the NDVI values depending on stand canopy density in high forests, coppice forests and artificially established stands.The stand canopy density data were collected from the Forest Management Plan and validated in the field, while the NDVI data were obtained using the Google Earth Engine platform based on Sentinel-2 Level 2A imagery.A one-way ANOVA was performed to assess the statistical significance of differences in the NDVI values between stand canopy density classes, followed by an LSD test for post-hoc group comparisons.The results of the research indicate that the arithmetic means of the NDVI values by stand canopy density across the three forest origin categories reveal a clear and consistent trend of decrease of the NDVI values with decreasing stand canopy density.The ANOVA revealed that the NDVI values differed significantly between stands with different levels of canopy density within each of the three forest origin groups.In all analyzed categories, stands with a dense canopy had the highest NDVI values.The highest NDVI values were recorded in high forest stands, while the lowest values were observed in artificially established stands.

The Journal Agriculture and ForestryVol. 71(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.