Taking stock of responsible leadership research: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Purpose This paper systematically reviews and consolidates the latest empirical evidence on responsible leadership (RL) to provide an interdisciplinary and comprehensive synthesis. The purpose of this study is to address the fragmented and ambiguous nature of the existing literature, offering a clearer understanding of the mechanisms linking RL to its antecedents, boundary conditions and outcomes, and identifying critical areas for future research. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a systematic review methodology, analyzing and synthesizing empirical evidence from various disciplines. This study focuses on studies across micro, meso and macro levels to provide a holistic perspective of RL, exploring the determinants, boundary conditions and outcomes of RL. Findings The review reveals five critical research gaps in the RL literature: the complex layering of RL, the boundary conditions affecting RL, a processual understanding of RL, the spatial dimensions of RL and the role of RL in the digital world. These gaps highlight the need for further research and offer multiple directions for advancing the field of RL. Research limitations/implications This paper highlights the need for more research on the boundary conditions and contextual factors influencing RL across different organizational settings and cultural environments. Practical implications The findings of this study provide practical insights for leaders seeking to implement RL strategies in their organizations, especially in addressing complex and evolving challenges in the current contexts. Social implications By advancing the understanding of RL, this study has implications for promoting better leadership practice, emphasizing social responsibility at multiple levels. Originality/value This paper offers a unique interdisciplinary synthesis of RL literature, consolidating fragmented research across multiple levels of analysis. By identifying key research gaps and providing a roadmap for future investigation, this study contributes to the ongoing development of this rapidly growing field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society and Business Review
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2024-0320
Primary Topic
Organizational Learning and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking stock of responsible leadership research: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Heidi Wechtler, Po-Hsin Lai, Nhut H. Nguyen
Society and Business Review
Organizational Learning and Leadership
article

Taking stock of responsible leadership research: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Heidi Wechtler, Po-Hsin Lai, Nhut H. Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper systematically reviews and consolidates the latest empirical evidence on responsible leadership (RL) to provide an interdisciplinary and comprehensive synthesis. The purpose of this study is to address the fragmented and ambiguous nature of the existing literature, offering a clearer understanding of the mechanisms linking RL to its antecedents, boundary conditions and outcomes, and identifying critical areas for future research. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a systematic review methodology, analyzing and synthesizing empirical evidence from various disciplines. This study focuses on studies across micro, meso and macro levels to provide a holistic perspective of RL, exploring the determinants, boundary conditions and outcomes of RL. Findings The review reveals five critical research gaps in the RL literature: the complex layering of RL, the boundary conditions affecting RL, a processual understanding of RL, the spatial dimensions of RL and the role of RL in the digital world. These gaps highlight the need for further research and offer multiple directions for advancing the field of RL. Research limitations/implications This paper highlights the need for more research on the boundary conditions and contextual factors influencing RL across different organizational settings and cultural environments. Practical implications The findings of this study provide practical insights for leaders seeking to implement RL strategies in their organizations, especially in addressing complex and evolving challenges in the current contexts. Social implications By advancing the understanding of RL, this study has implications for promoting better leadership practice, emphasizing social responsibility at multiple levels. Originality/value This paper offers a unique interdisciplinary synthesis of RL literature, consolidating fragmented research across multiple levels of analysis. By identifying key research gaps and providing a roadmap for future investigation, this study contributes to the ongoing development of this rapidly growing field.

Society and Business ReviewVol. 21(2)
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (VN), National Dong Hwa University (TW), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Organizational Learning and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.